[LTP] [PATCH v3 1/5] syscalls/quotactl01.c: Add Q_GETNEXQUOTA test
Yang Xu
xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
Thu Nov 21 04:59:44 CET 2019
on 2019/11/21 1:09, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Xu,
>
>>>> TEST(quotactl(tc->cmd, tst_device->dev, *tc->id, tc->addr));
>>>> + if (TST_ERR == EINVAL) {
>>>> + tst_res(TCONF, "Current system doesn't support this cmd");
>>> nit: cmd? Maybe something like "quotactl() syscall does not support this command"
>>> or "quotactl() syscall does not support to %s", tc->des to follow other messages. I'd actually prefer to have some macro, which prints QCMD flags, but that's a detail which we can >ignore.
>> I think we can add some info before each run (such as prctl02.c and copy_file_range02.c, make error cases more clear ), as below:
>> tst_res(TINFO, "Test #%d: %s", n, tc->tname); // this tname is a QCMD_string
> +1. It could use similar approach as it's in testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c
>
> #define POLICY_DESC(x) .policy = x, .desc = #x
> #define POLICY_DESC_TEXT(x, y) .policy = x, .desc = #x" ("y")"
>
> static struct test_case tcase[] = {
> {
> POLICY_DESC(MPOL_DEFAULT),
> ...
> },
> {
> POLICY_DESC_TEXT(MPOL_DEFAULT, "target exists"),
>
> But I'd prefer to have it as a separate patch after v4 of this patchset is merged.
> I'd prefer to finish v4 (I've already fixed small formatting things, I can fix
> the rest of needed things myself).
Hi Petr
Using a macro is a better way.
Thanks
Yang Xu
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20191121/19ca1160/attachment.htm>
More information about the ltp
mailing list