[LTP] [PATCH v1 03/10] syscalls/ioctl_loop01: Add LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR and LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN test

Yang Xu xuyang_jy_0410@163.com
Mon Apr 6 08:27:44 CEST 2020


Hi Cyril

> Hi!
>> For LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR flag, we only check autoclear fieldvalue in sys
>> directory and also get lo_flags by using LOOP_GET_STATUS.
>>
>> For LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN flag, it is the same as LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR flag.
>> But we also check whether we can scan partition table correctly ie check
>> whether /dev/loopnp1 and /sys/bloclk/loop0/loop0p1 existed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>   runtest/syscalls                              |   3 +-
>>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/.gitignore    |   1 +
>>   .../kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop01.c      | 127 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>   create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop01.c
>>
>> diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
>> index 777f0ac6a..7fd67450e 100644
>> --- a/runtest/syscalls
>> +++ b/runtest/syscalls
>> @@ -524,10 +524,11 @@ ioctl03      ioctl03
>>   ioctl04      ioctl04
>>   ioctl05      ioctl05
>>   ioctl06      ioctl06
>> -
>>   ioctl07      ioctl07
>>   ioctl08      ioctl08
>>   
>> +ioctl_loop01 ioctl_loop01
>> +
>>   ioctl_ns01 ioctl_ns01
>>   ioctl_ns02 ioctl_ns02
>>   ioctl_ns03 ioctl_ns03
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/.gitignore
>> index 97fbb9681..4cfef2839 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/.gitignore
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/.gitignore
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>   /ioctl06
>>   /ioctl07
>>   /ioctl08
>> +/ioctl_loop01
>>   /ioctl_ns01
>>   /ioctl_ns02
>>   /ioctl_ns03
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop01.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..e806e0443
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop01.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
>> + * Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.jujitsu.com>
>> + *
>> + * This is a basic ioctl test about loopdevice.
>> + * It is designed to test LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR and LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN flag.
>> + *
>> + * For LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR flag, we only check autoclear fieldvalue in sys
>> + * directory and also get lo_flags by using LOOP_GET_STATUS.
>> + *
>> + * For LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN flag, it is the same as LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR flag.
>> + * But we also check whether we can scan partition table correctly ie check
>> + * whether /dev/loopnp1 and /sys/bloclk/loop0/loop0p1 existed.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <string.h>
>> +#include "ioctl_loop_support.h"
>> +#include "lapi/loop.h"
>> +#include "tst_test.h"
>> +
>> +static char dev_path[1024], backing_path[1024], backing_file_path[1024];
>> +static int dev_num, attach_flag, dev_fd;
>> +/*
>> + *In drivers/block/loop.c code, set status function doesn't handle
>> + *LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY flag and ingore it. Only loop_set_fd with rondonly
>> + *mode file_fd, lo_flags will include LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY.
>> + */
>> +#define set_flags (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR | LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN | LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY | LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO)
>> +#define get_flags (LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR | LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
>> +
>> +static char partscan_path[1024], autoclear_path[1024];
>> +static char loop_partpath[1026], sys_loop_partpath[1026];
>> +
>> +static void verify_ioctl_loop(void)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct loop_info loopinfo, loopinfoget;
>> +
>> +	tst_attach_device(dev_path, "test.img");
>> +	attach_flag = 1;
>> +
>> +	check_sys_value(partscan_path, 0);
>> +	check_sys_value(autoclear_path, 0);
>> +	check_sys_string(backing_path, backing_file_path);
>> +
>> +	dev_fd = SAFE_OPEN(dev_path, O_RDWR);
>> +	memset(&loopinfo, 0, sizeof(loopinfo));
>> +	memset(&loopinfo, 0, sizeof(loopinfoget));
>> +
>> +	loopinfo.lo_flags = set_flags;
>> +	SAFE_IOCTL(dev_fd, LOOP_SET_STATUS, &loopinfo);
> 
> I guess that it would be safer to memset() the loopinfo_get here, also
> if we zero the structure we may as well reuse the loopinfo here as well.
>
of coure, I will add memset in here.

>> +	SAFE_IOCTL(dev_fd, LOOP_GET_STATUS, &loopinfoget);
>> +
>> +	if (loopinfoget.lo_flags & ~get_flags)
>> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "expect %d but got %d", get_flags, loopinfoget.lo_flags);
>> +	else
>> +		tst_res(TPASS, "get expected lo_flag %d", loopinfoget.lo_flags);
>> +
>> +	ret = access(loop_partpath, F_OK);
>> +	if (ret == 0)
>> +		tst_res(TPASS, "access %s succeeds", loop_partpath);
>> +	else
>> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "access %s fails", loop_partpath);
>> +
>> +	ret = access(sys_loop_partpath, F_OK);
>> +	if (ret == 0)
>> +		tst_res(TPASS, "access %s succeeds", sys_loop_partpath);
>> +	else
>> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "access %s fails", sys_loop_partpath);
>> +
>> +	check_sys_value(partscan_path, 1);
>> +	check_sys_value(autoclear_path, 1);
>> +
>> +	SAFE_CLOSE(dev_fd);
>> +	tst_detach_device(dev_path);
>> +	attach_flag = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void setup(void)
>> +{
>> +	const char *const cmd_dd[] = {"dd", "if=/dev/zero", "of=test.img", "bs=1M", "count=10", NULL};
>> +	const char *const cmd_parted[] = {"parted", "-s", "test.img", "mklabel", "msdos", "mkpart",
>> +						"primary", "ext4", "1M", "10M", NULL};
>> +
>> +	dev_num = tst_find_free_loopdev(dev_path, sizeof(dev_path));
>> +	if (dev_num < 0)
>> +		tst_brk(TBROK, "Failed to find free loop device");
>> +
>> +	SAFE_CMD(cmd_dd, NULL, NULL);
> 
> Why not tst_fill_file("test.img", 0, 1024 * 1024, 10); ?
>
I will try this.

>> +	SAFE_CMD(cmd_parted, NULL, NULL);
> 
> I wonder if we can avoid dependency on parted by having a look at the
> changes in the image after the call to parted and writing a few bytes
> ourselves instead.
I will see kernel code to figure out this, if no other good way, we can 
split this check into a new single test. it can make this case less couping.
> 
>> +	sprintf(partscan_path, "/sys/block/loop%d/loop/partscan", dev_num);
>> +	sprintf(autoclear_path, "/sys/block/loop%d/loop/autoclear", dev_num);
>> +	sprintf(backing_path, "/sys/block/loop%d/loop/backing_file", dev_num);
>> +	sprintf(sys_loop_partpath, "/sys/block/loop%d/loop%dp1", dev_num, dev_num);
>> +	sprintf(backing_file_path, "%s/test.img", tst_get_tmpdir());
>> +	sprintf(loop_partpath, "%sp1", dev_path);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cleanup(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (dev_fd > 0)
>> +		SAFE_CLOSE(dev_fd);
>> +	if (attach_flag)
>> +		tst_detach_device(dev_path);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct tst_test test = {
>> +	.setup = setup,
>> +	.cleanup = cleanup,
>> +	.test_all = verify_ioctl_loop,
>> +	.needs_root = 1,
>> +	.needs_cmds = (const char *const []) {
>> +		"dd",
>> +		"parted",
>> +		NULL
>> +	},
>> +	.needs_drivers = (const char *const []) {
>> +		"loop",
>> +		NULL
>> +	},
>> +	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
>> +};
>> -- 
>> 2.23.0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
> 



More information about the ltp mailing list