[LTP] [PATCH V3 2/2] libs: sigwait: Get rid of REPORT_SUCCESS() macro
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Tue Aug 4 09:57:53 CEST 2020
This is rather making the code difficult to read, get rid of it and its
associated functions.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
V3: Improved print messages.
libs/libltpsigwait/sigwait.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libs/libltpsigwait/sigwait.c b/libs/libltpsigwait/sigwait.c
index fd32efd8aa9f..2be949929fb1 100644
--- a/libs/libltpsigwait/sigwait.c
+++ b/libs/libltpsigwait/sigwait.c
@@ -9,39 +9,6 @@
#include "libsigwait.h"
#include "tst_sig_proc.h"
-/* Report success iff TST_RET and TST_ERR are equal to
- exp_return and exp_errno, resp., and cond is true. If cond is not
- true, report condition_errmsg
-*/
-static void report_success_cond(const char *func, int line,
- long exp_return, int exp_errno, int condition,
- char *condition_errmsg)
-{
- if (exp_return == TST_RET
- && (exp_return != -1 || exp_errno == TST_ERR))
- if (condition)
- tst_res(TPASS, "%s (%d): Test passed", func, line);
- else
- tst_res(TFAIL, "%s (%d): %s", func, line,
- condition_errmsg);
- else if (TST_RET != -1)
- tst_res(TFAIL,
- "%s (%d): Unexpected return value; expected %ld, got %ld",
- func, line, exp_return, TST_RET);
- else
- tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "%s (%d): Unexpected failure",
- func, line);
-}
-
-#define REPORT_SUCCESS_COND(exp_return, exp_errno, condition, condition_errmsg) \
- report_success_cond(__FUNCTION__, __LINE__, exp_return, exp_errno, condition, condition_errmsg);
-
-/* Report success iff TST_RET and TST_ERR are equal to
- exp_return and exp_errno, resp.
-*/
-#define REPORT_SUCCESS(exp_return, exp_errno) \
- REPORT_SUCCESS_COND(exp_return, exp_errno, 1, "");
-
void test_empty_set(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo,
enum tst_ts_type type LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
@@ -55,7 +22,14 @@ void test_empty_set(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo,
child = create_sig_proc(signo, INT_MAX, 100000);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, &si, NULL));
- REPORT_SUCCESS(-1, EINTR);
+ if (TST_RET == -1) {
+ if (TST_ERR == EINTR)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Wait interrupted by expected signal");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "Expected error number EINTR, got");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Expected return value -1, got: %ld", TST_RET);
+ }
SAFE_KILL(child, SIGTERM);
SAFE_WAIT(NULL);
@@ -78,7 +52,14 @@ void test_timeout(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo, enum tst_ts_type type)
child = create_sig_proc(signo, INT_MAX, 100000);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, &si, tst_ts_get(&ts)));
- REPORT_SUCCESS(-1, EAGAIN);
+ if (TST_RET == -1) {
+ if (TST_ERR == EAGAIN)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Wait interrupted by timeout");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "Expected error number EAGAIN, got");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Expected return value -1, got: %ld", TST_RET);
+ }
SAFE_KILL(child, SIGTERM);
SAFE_WAIT(NULL);
@@ -101,9 +82,15 @@ void test_unmasked_matching(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo,
child = create_sig_proc(signo, INT_MAX, 100000);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, &si, NULL));
- REPORT_SUCCESS_COND(signo, 0, si.si_pid == child
- && si.si_code == SI_USER
- && si.si_signo == signo, "Struct siginfo mismatch");
+ if (TST_RET == signo) {
+ if (si.si_pid == child && si.si_code == SI_USER &&
+ si.si_signo == signo)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "struct siginfo is correct");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "struct siginfo mismatch");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "sigwaitinfo() failed");
+ }
SAFE_KILL(child, SIGTERM);
SAFE_WAIT(NULL);
@@ -122,7 +109,10 @@ void test_unmasked_matching_noinfo(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo,
child = create_sig_proc(signo, INT_MAX, 100000);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, NULL, NULL));
- REPORT_SUCCESS(signo, 0);
+ if (TST_RET == signo)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Wait interrupted by expected signal");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "sigwaitinfo() failed");
SAFE_KILL(child, SIGTERM);
SAFE_WAIT(NULL);
@@ -152,9 +142,15 @@ void test_masked_matching(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo,
child = create_sig_proc(signo, 1, 0);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, &si, NULL));
- REPORT_SUCCESS_COND(signo, 0, si.si_pid == child
- && si.si_code == SI_USER
- && si.si_signo == signo, "Struct siginfo mismatch");
+ if (TST_RET == signo) {
+ if (si.si_pid == child && si.si_code == SI_USER &&
+ si.si_signo == signo)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "struct siginfo is correct");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "struct siginfo mismatch");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "sigwaitinfo() failed");
+ }
TEST(sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &oldmask, &sigs));
if (TST_RET == -1)
@@ -203,16 +199,27 @@ void test_masked_matching_rt(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo,
SAFE_WAITPID(child[1], &status, 0);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, &si, NULL));
- REPORT_SUCCESS_COND(signo, 0, si.si_pid == child[0]
- && si.si_code == SI_USER
- && si.si_signo == signo, "Struct siginfo mismatch");
+ if (TST_RET == signo) {
+ if (si.si_pid == child[0] && si.si_code == SI_USER &&
+ si.si_signo == signo)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "struct siginfo is correct");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "struct siginfo mismatch");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "sigwaitinfo() failed");
+ }
/* eat the other signal */
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, &si, NULL));
- REPORT_SUCCESS_COND(signo + 1, 0, si.si_pid == child[1]
- && si.si_code == SI_USER
- && si.si_signo == signo + 1,
- "Struct siginfo mismatch");
+ if (TST_RET == signo + 1) {
+ if (si.si_pid == child[1] && si.si_code == SI_USER &&
+ si.si_signo == signo + 1)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "struct siginfo is correct");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "struct siginfo mismatch");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "sigwaitinfo() failed");
+ }
TEST(sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &oldmask, &sigs));
if (TST_RET == -1)
@@ -248,7 +255,10 @@ void test_masked_matching_noinfo(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo,
child = create_sig_proc(signo, 1, 0);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, NULL, NULL));
- REPORT_SUCCESS(signo, 0);
+ if (TST_RET == signo)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Wait interrupted by expected signal");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "sigwaitinfo() failed");
TEST(sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &oldmask, &sigs));
if (TST_RET == -1)
@@ -287,7 +297,14 @@ void test_bad_address(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo,
child = create_sig_proc(signo, 1, 0);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, (void *)1, NULL));
- REPORT_SUCCESS(-1, EFAULT);
+ if (TST_RET == -1) {
+ if (TST_ERR == EFAULT)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Fault occurred while accessing the buffers");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "Expected error number EFAULT, got");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Expected return value -1, got: %ld", TST_RET);
+ }
TEST(sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &oldmask, NULL));
if (TST_RET == -1)
@@ -316,8 +333,7 @@ void test_bad_address2(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
if (TST_RET == -1 && TST_ERR == EFAULT)
_exit(0);
- tst_res(TINFO | TTERRNO, "swi_func returned: %ld",
- TST_RET);
+ tst_res(TINFO | TTERRNO, "swi_func returned: %ld", TST_RET);
_exit(1);
}
@@ -325,7 +341,7 @@ void test_bad_address2(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
if ((WIFSIGNALED(status) && WTERMSIG(status) == SIGSEGV)
|| (WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status) == 0)) {
- tst_res(TPASS, "Test passed");
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Child exited with expected code");
return;
}
@@ -346,7 +362,14 @@ void test_bad_address3(swi_func sigwaitinfo, int signo LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
SAFE_SIGEMPTYSET(&sigs);
TEST(sigwaitinfo(&sigs, NULL, (void *)1));
- REPORT_SUCCESS(-1, EFAULT);
+ if (TST_RET == -1) {
+ if (TST_ERR == EFAULT)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Fault occurred while accessing the buffers");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "Expected error number EFAULT, got");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Expected return value -1, got: %ld", TST_RET);
+ }
}
static void empty_handler(int sig LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
--
2.14.1
More information about the ltp
mailing list