[LTP] [PATCH v5 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests

[Mimi Zohar]

On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 09:33 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Mimi,
> 
> > Hi Petr,
> 
> > On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 23:19 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > The only problem which bothers me is failure on ima_policy=tcb:
> 
> > > evmctl ima_measurement /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/binary_runtime_measurements -vv
> > > ...
> > > sha256: PCRAgg  10: c19866f10132282d4cf20ca45f50078db843f95dc8d1ea8819d0e240cdf3b21c
> > > sha256: TPM PCR-10: df913daa0437a2365f710f6d93a4f2d37146414425d9aaa60740dc635d187158
> > > sha256: PCRAgg 10 does not match TPM PCR-10
> > > Failed to match per TPM bank or SHA1 padded TPM digest(s) (count 1446)
> > > errno: No such file or directory (2)
> 
> > > Thus test get failure for the fist run without --ignore-violations
> > > ...
> > > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: using command: evmctl ima_boot_aggregate -v
> > > Using tss2-rc-decode to read PCRs.
> > > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: IMA boot aggregate: '0756853d9378ff6473966e20610a8d1cb97e4dc613cb87adf5e870c8eb93fd0f'
> > > ima_tpm 1 TPASS: bios boot aggregate matches IMA boot aggregate
> > > ima_tpm 2 TINFO: verify PCR values
> > > ima_tpm 2 TINFO: real PCR-10: '6d8aec6291c0c19efdee50e20899939135be073cd4d6e9063e53386f54f9487d'
> > > ima_tpm 2 TFAIL: evmctl failed, trying with --ignore-violations
> > > ima_tpm 2 TINFO: aggregate PCR-10: '6d8aec6291c0c19efdee50e20899939135be073cd4d6e9063e53386f54f9487d'
> > > ima_tpm 2 TPASS: aggregate PCR value matches real PCR value
> > > ima_tpm 3 TINFO: AppArmor enabled, this may affect test results
> > > ima_tpm 3 TINFO: it can be disabled with TST_DISABLE_APPARMOR=1 (requires super/root)
> > > ima_tpm 3 TINFO: loaded AppArmor profiles: none
> 
> > > Summary:
> > > passed   2
> > > failed   1
> > > skipped  0
> > > warnings 0
> 
> > > IMHO unless this is specific for this particular TPM we should skip test
> > > if ima_policy=tcb.
> 
> > No, I don't think so.  Violations are a result of a file being opened
> > for read and write at the same time.  Opening a file for write, when it
> > is already open for read, results in a Time of Measure/Time of Use
> > (ToMToU) violation.  Opening a file for read, when it is already open
> > for write, results in an open_writer violation.  One of the more common
> > reasons for these violations are log files.
> 
> > With the builtin TCB measurement policy enabled on the boot command
> > line, files are measured from the beginning, before a custom policy is
> > loaded.  Normally a custom policy is loaded after an LSM policy has
> > been loaded, allowing IMA policy rules to be defined in terms of LSM
> > labels.
> 
> > Verifying the IMA measurement list against the TPM PCRs is an important
> > test.  Ignoring violations doesn't make sense either.   Perhaps if a
> > custom policy has not been loaded, emit an informational message and
> > skip the test without "--ignore-violations".
> 
> Thanks for an explanation. Agree, you're right. It's most likely wrong setup
> (there were some temporary files in /tmp and even postfix pid file in /var/run/),
> I need to properly setup dracut-ima. It'd be then good to document this, but I'd
> do it as separate effort.
> 
> So, can I merge the patchset with your ack/review-by?

Yes, I just finished reviewing the patches.   Other that clarifying the
patch descriptions and fixing the one typo  ("tmp" -> "tpm"), it looks
really.

thanks! 

Mimi