[LTP] [PATCH V2 05/10] syscalls/fsconfig: New tests

[Viresh Kumar]

On 20-02-20, 13:41, Li Wang wrote:
> > +       TEST(fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_PATH, "foo", tst_device->dev,
> > AT_FDCWD));
> > +       if (TST_RET == -1) {
> > +               if (TST_ERR == EOPNOTSUPP) {
> > +                       tst_res(TINFO, "fsconfig(): FSCONFIG_SET_PATH not
> > supported");

On my ARM setup, I always hit this path for few of the syscalls :(

> > +               } else {
> > +                       tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO, "fsconfig() failed");
> >
> 
> The test reports an EINVAL error when testing fsconfig() with
> 'FSCONFIG_SET_PATH' on XFS. I'm now trying to look close to this issue.
> 
> kernel: 5.6.0-rc2+ x86_64
> 
> tst_test.c:1278: INFO: Testing on xfs
> tst_mkfs.c:90: INFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with xfs opts='' extra opts=''
> tst_test.c:1217: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> fsconfig01.c:46: FAIL: fsconfig() failed: EINVAL (22)

Both "foo" and tst_device->dev may be wrong here unfortunately. Same
for few other commands like: _PATH, _PATH_EMPTY, _FD..

-- 
viresh