[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/pipe13: Add regression test for pipe to wake up all readers
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Mon Feb 24 13:58:02 CET 2020
Hi!
> +static void verify_pipe(void)
> +{
> + int fds[2];
> + int status1, status2;
> + pid_t p1, p2;
> + int ret;
> +
> + SAFE_PIPE(fds);
> +
> + p1 = SAFE_FORK();
> + if (p1 == 0) {
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fds[1]);
> + SAFE_READ(0, fds[0], &status1, sizeof(status1));
^
Why status1 here?
can't we just pass a dummy
char buf; and size 1 here?
It's not being written to
anyways.
> + exit(0);
> + }
> + p2 = SAFE_FORK();
> + if (p2 == 0) {
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fds[1]);
> + SAFE_READ(0, fds[0], &status2, sizeof(status2));
^
Here as well.
> + exit(0);
> + }
> +
> + sleep(1);
This sleep here has to be replaced by a proper synchronization given
that it's here to make sure both of the readers sleep on the pipe we
should:
* Use checkpoints to make sure both of the children have managed
to get before the SAFE_READ().
* The the parent should use the TST_PROCESS_STATE_WAIT() to make sure
both of the chidlren are sleeping
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fds[1]);
> +
> + SAFE_WAITPID(p1, &status1, 0);
> + ret = waitpid(p2, &status2, WNOHANG);
We should just use waitpid with -1 as a pid here and WNOHANG twice,
because if one of the children hangs it's not guaranteed in any way
which one would that be.
> + if (ret == p2) {
> + tst_res(TPASS, "pipe wakes up everybody when last write closes");
> + } else {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "pipe doesn't wake up every body when last write closes");
> + SAFE_KILL(p2, SIGKILL);
> + SAFE_WAIT(&status2);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .test_all = verify_pipe,
> + .forks_child = 1,
> + .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
> + {"linux-git", "6551d5c56eb"},
> + {}
> + }
> +};
> --
> 2.18.0
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list