[LTP] [PATCH V3 08/10] syscalls/move_mount: New tests

[Viresh Kumar]

On 25-02-20, 14:57, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > +	TEST(fsconfig(fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "source", tst_device->dev, 0));
> > +	if (TST_RET == -1) {
> > +		SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> > +		tst_res(TBROK | TERRNO, "fsconfig() failed");
> These should be TFAIL otherwise it 1) breaks all tests 2) does not report any
> result:
> 
> move_mount02.c:37: BROK: fsopen() failed: SUCCESS (0)
> tst_test.c:1051: BROK: Test 0 haven't reported results!

I am a bit confused about TBROK and TFAIL to be honest. The test
writing guideline says this:

| 'TFAIL' | Test has failed.
| 'TBROK' | Something has failed in test preparation phase.

And so in my code I have been using TFAIL only for the failures for the
actual syscalls that we are testing, like move_mount here. And I have
been using TBROK for pretty much everything else.

Would be good if you and Cyril can explain what's the correct usage
model for these is.

-- 
viresh