[LTP] [PATCH 2/3] tst_device.h: Use lapi/syscalls.h instead of <sys/syscall.h>

[Petr Vorel]

Hi,

> On 1/20/20 1:03 PM, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > But none of lapi/syscalls.h use is in the API headers (only in API C and tests)

> And you could avoid #including lapi/syscalls.h in API headers by simply
> moving the implementation of tst_dev_sync() to lib/tst_device.c.

> Why do you guys use static inline functions so much anyway? There are no
> technical reasons to do that except for default main().

+1. I still think it's not good to include lapi/syscalls.h even it does not
break anything. I'll send a patch which uses tst_syscall in socketcall01.c and
second commit which moves tst_dev_sync() to lib/tst_device.c.
It's up to you if agree on second one.

Kind regards,
Petr