[LTP] [PATCH V4 5/6] syscalls: Don't pass struct timespec to tst_syscall()

Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Wed Jul 8 04:34:23 CEST 2020


On 07-07-20, 13:49, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > > Huh, how come the syscall is called clock_getres_time64 while the rest
> > > has only 64 appended such as clock_gettime64 and clock_settime64?
> > > 
> > > That's really strange...
> > 
> > That also made me wonder on how should I be naming routines.
> > Apparently they wanted to have "time64" in the name, if the syscall
> > already has "time" in it they just appended 64, else added "_time64".
> 
> If that is the case in upstream we should follow that convence for the
> functions as well...

That's what I tried to do in my patches normally.

-- 
viresh


More information about the ltp mailing list