[LTP] [PATCH v2 4/7] net: Update README.md

[Petr Vorel]

Hi,

...
> > +++ b/testcases/network/README.md
...
> >   ## Server Services Configuration
> >   Verify that the below daemon services are running. If not, please install
> >   and start them:
> > -rsh-server, telnet-server, finger-server, rdist, rsync, dhcp-server, http-server.
> > +
> > +dhcp-server, dnsmasq, http-server, nfs-kernel-server, rpcbind, rsync,
> > +telnet-server, vsftpd
> Hi Petr,

> These package names are from Debian/Ubuntu, do we need to mention it?
All these packages are at least in Debian/Ubuntu and openSUSE. IMHO other
distros have similar names. Exception is nfs-kernel-server, which is at least on
Fedora/RHEL nfs-server. Thus something like:

dhcp-server, dnsmasq, http-server, nfs-kernel-server or nfs-server, rpcbind,
rsync,telnet-server, vsftpd

> >   Note: If any of the above daemon is not running on server, the test related to
> >   that service running from client will fail.

> > -### FTP setup
> > -* In “/etc/ftpusers” [or vi /etc/vsftpd.ftpusers], comment the line containing
> > -“root” string. This file lists all those users who are not given access to do ftp
> > +### FTP and telnet setup
> > +Both tests require environment variables `RHOST` (remote machine), `RUSER`
> > +(remote user) and `PASSWD` (remote password). NOTE: `RHOST` will imply two host
> > +configuratioe for other tests.
> > +
> > +If `RHOST` is set to `root`, either of these steps is required:
> > +
> > +* In `/etc/ftpusers` (or `/etc/vsftpd.ftpusers`), comment the line containing
> > +"root" string. This file lists all those users who are not given access to do ftp
> >   on the current system.
> Are this file from Debian/Ubuntu as well?
Again, /etc/ftpusers is at least for openSUSE and Debian/Ubuntu.
Fedora/RHEL has /etc/vsftpd/ftpusers and /etc/vsftpd/user_list
/etc/vsftpd.ftpusers looks like to be on RHEL 4/ some old Fedora.

Thus:
* In `/etc/ftpusers` (or `/etc/vsftpd/ftpusers` or `/etc/vsftpd.ftpusers`),
* comment the line containing
...

I also wondered if setup should mention something related to single test,
but it didn't harm. I was thinking whether ftp test is worth to keep (and thus
need to be rewritten), but understand it's useful as a high level smoke test.

OK with these changes?

Kind regards,
Petr

> Other than this, it is good to me. :-)
> Acked-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>

> Thanks,
> Xiao Yang