[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/ioctl_loop05: set loop blksize to bdev blksize
Yang Xu
xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
Tue Jun 2 06:53:04 CEST 2020
Hi Jan
> Test is failing on s390, where default loop blksize is less than
> backing dev's blksize (4096):
> tst_test.c:1247: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> tst_device.c:88: INFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
> ioctl_loop05.c:116: INFO: /dev/loop0 default logical_block_size is 512
> ioctl_loop05.c:62: INFO: Without setting lo_offset or sizelimit
> ioctl_loop05.c:63: BROK: ioctl(3,LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO,...) failed: EINVAL (22)
>
After looking kernel code, I think removing BLKSSZGET ioctl is ok.
Also since kernel commit 85560117d00 ("loop: change queue block size to
match when using DIO"), it will change logic block size automaticly when
fd is opened with O_DIRECT. Can we use it(just a suggestion)?
> Per kernel comment at __loop_update_dio(), direct io is supported
> when "logical block size of loop is bigger than the backing device's".
>
> Set loop blksize to one of backing device. Retry is there to avoid
> EAGAIN warning "loop0 (test.img) has still dirty pages".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> ---
> .../kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop05.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop05.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop05.c
> index 6c9ea2802981..a969978239a5 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop05.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop05.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,9 @@ static void verify_ioctl_loop(void)
>
> static void setup(void)
> {
> + int fd;
> + struct stat buf;
> +
> if (tst_fs_type(".") == TST_TMPFS_MAGIC)
> tst_brk(TCONF, "tmpfd doesn't support O_DIRECT flag");
>
> @@ -105,6 +108,14 @@ static void setup(void)
>
> sprintf(sys_loop_diopath, "/sys/block/loop%d/loop/dio", dev_num);
> tst_fill_file("test.img", 0, 1024, 1024);
> +
> + fd = SAFE_OPEN("test.img", O_RDONLY);
> + SAFE_FSTAT(fd, &buf);
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> +
> + logical_block_size = buf.st_blksize;
> + tst_res(TINFO, "backing dev logical_block_size is %d", logical_block_size);
> +
> tst_attach_device(dev_path, "test.img");
> attach_flag = 1;
> dev_fd = SAFE_OPEN(dev_path, O_RDWR);
> @@ -112,8 +123,14 @@ static void setup(void)
> if (ioctl(dev_fd, LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO, 0) && errno == EINVAL)
> tst_brk(TCONF, "LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO is not supported");
>
> - SAFE_IOCTL(dev_fd, BLKSSZGET, &logical_block_size);
> - tst_res(TINFO, "%s default logical_block_size is %d", dev_path, logical_block_size);
> + /*
> + * from __loop_update_dio():
> + * We support direct I/O only if lo_offset is aligned with the
> + * logical I/O size of backing device, and the logical block
> + * size of loop is bigger than the backing device's and the loop
> + * needn't transform transfer.
> + */
> + TST_RETRY_FUNC(ioctl(dev_fd, LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE, logical_block_size), TST_RETVAL_EQ0);
LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO was introduce since 4.10 and LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE
ioctl was introduced since kernel 4.14, I guess we should add a check
for LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE in here.
Best Regards
Yang Xu
> }
>
> static void cleanup(void)
>
More information about the ltp
mailing list