[LTP] [PATCH] pthread_cond_init/s-c.c: Add the lose ifndef line

[Yang Xu]

Hi Cyril

On my environment, when I test openposix, this case missed run and 
complie because locate-test has filter rules called by 
open_posix_testsuite/scripts/generate-makefiles.sh.  filter rules as below:

runnable)
         find "$WHERE/conformance" "$WHERE/stress" -type f -name 
'*[0-9].c' -o -name '[0-9]*-[0-9]*.sh' | grep -v buildonly | grep -v 
'^./tools'
         find "$WHERE/functional" -type f -name '*.c'

I have a question why we leave it here if they are no meaningful. If
it was meaningful, why we filter this case? I see the history, but found 
no thing.

@Enji, you often change openposix code, can you give me some advise?

Best Regards
Yang Xu

> Hi Zou
> 
> It was introduced by commit 310c9eb6e6("Remove explicit #define's for 
> `_POSIX_C_SOURCE` and `_XOPEN_SOURCE`").
> 
> IMO, we can remove this WITHOUT_XOPEN macro directly because we have 
> setted -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 in 
> ltp/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/CFLAGS.
> 
> Best Regards
> Yang Xu
>> pthread_cond_init/s-c.c testcase lose a #ifndef line, fix it
>>
>> Reported-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   
>> testcases/open_posix_testsuite/stress/threads/pthread_cond_init/s-c.c 
>> | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git 
>> a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/stress/threads/pthread_cond_init/s-c.c b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/stress/threads/pthread_cond_init/s-c.c 
>>
>> index 6a5c70a..8d18484 100644
>> --- 
>> a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/stress/threads/pthread_cond_init/s-c.c
>> +++ 
>> b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/stress/threads/pthread_cond_init/s-c.c
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
>>   /***********************************    Test case   
>> *****************************************/
>>   
>> /********************************************************************************************/ 
>>
>> +#ifndef WITHOUT_XOPEN
>>   typedef struct _teststruct {
>>       pthread_cond_t cnd[10 * SCALABILITY_FACTOR];
>>       pthread_condattr_t ca[4];
>> -- 
>> 2.6.2
>>
>>
> 
> 
>