[LTP] [PATCH 1/2] Update syscalls/fsync02 to new API
Jozef Pupava
jpupava@suse.cz
Thu Mar 26 11:15:31 CET 2020
Hi Petr,
I will add return for better readability in second patch.
Jozef
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:37:59 +0100
Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi Jozef,
>
> LGTM, thanks for your patch.
> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
>
> > + if (time_end == -1) {
> > + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "getting end time
> > failed");
> > + } else if (TST_RET == -1) {
> > + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "fsync failed");
> > + } else if (TST_RET != 0) {
> > + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
> > + "fsync failed with unexpected return value");
> > + } else if (time_end < time_start) {
> > + tst_res(TFAIL,
> > + "timer broken end %ld < start %ld",
> > + time_end, time_start);
> > + } else if ((time_delta =
> > + difftime(time_end, time_start)) > TIME_LIMIT) {
> > + tst_res(TFAIL,
> > + "fsync took too long: %lf seconds; "
> > + "max_block: %d; data_blocks: %d",
> > + time_delta, max_block, data_blocks);
> > + } else {
> > + tst_res(TPASS,
> > + "fsync succeeded in an acceptable amount of time");
> > + }
>
> nit: note Cyril prefers due better readability return from function
> instead of having too much else if. So something like this might be
> more readable. But up to you.
>
> if (time_end == -1) {
> tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "getting end time failed");
> return;
> }
>
> if (TST_RET == -1) {
> tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "fsync failed");
> return;
> }
>
> if (TST_RET != 0) {
> tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "fsync failed with
> unexpected return value"); return;
> }
>
> if (time_end < time_start) {
> tst_res(TFAIL, "timer broken end %ld < start %ld",
> time_end, time_start);
> return;
> }
>
> if ((time_delta = difftime(time_end, time_start)) >
> TIME_LIMIT) { tst_res(TFAIL,
> "fsync took too long: %lf seconds; max_block: %d;
> data_blocks: %d", time_delta, max_block, data_blocks);
> return;
> }
>
> tst_res(TPASS, "fsync succeeded in an acceptable amount of
> time");
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
More information about the ltp
mailing list