[LTP] [PATCH V2 15/17] syscalls/semtimedop: Add support for semtimedop and its time64 version

[Li Wang]

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:43 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
wrote:

> On 09-05-20, 12:21, Li Wang wrote:
> > RHEL8.2(x84_64) failed as:
> >
> > # ./semop05
> > tst_test.c:1246: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > semop05.c:147: INFO: Testing variant: semop: vDSO or syscall
> > semop05.c:132: PASS: expected failure: EIDRM (43)
> > semop05.c:132: PASS: expected failure: EIDRM (43)
> > semop05.c:132: PASS: expected failure: EINTR (4)
> > semop05.c:132: PASS: expected failure: EINTR (4)
> > tst_test.c:1246: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > semop05.c:147: INFO: Testing variant: semtimedop: syscall with kernel
> spec64
> > semop05.c:134: FAIL: unexpected failure: EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK (11)
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > tst_test.c:1286: INFO: If you are running on slow machine, try exporting
> > LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL > 1
> > tst_test.c:1287: BROK: Test killed! (timeout?)
> >
> >
> > RHEL8.2(s390x) failed as:
> >
> > tst_test.c:1246: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > semop05.c:147: INFO: Testing variant: semop: vDSO or syscall
> > semop05.c:132: PASS: expected failure: EIDRM (43)
> > semop05.c:132: PASS: expected failure: EIDRM (43)
> > semop05.c:132: PASS: expected failure: EINTR (4)
> > semop05.c:132: PASS: expected failure: EINTR (4)
> > tst_test.c:1246: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > semop05.c:147: INFO: Testing variant: semtimedop: syscall with kernel
> spec64
> > semop.h:13: CONF: syscall(392) __NR_semtimedop not supported
> > Test timeouted, sending SIGKILL!
> > tst_test.c:1286: INFO: If you are running on slow machine, try exporting
> > LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL > 1
> > tst_test.c:1287: BROK: Test killed! (timeout?)
>
> Some part of the timeout was left uninitialized and so was causing
> some issues. Can you please try with this delta:
>

This delta works(on x86_64) for me. But the s390x issue looks like the same
as the futex TCONF in another email.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20200511/67b4f9ab/attachment-0001.htm>