[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/pidfd_open*.c: Drop .min_kver flag

[Xiao Yang]

于 2020/5/13 14:13, Viresh Kumar 写道:
> On 13-05-20, 14:03, Xiao Yang wrote:
>> Could you tell which issue happen? Thanks a lot.
>> The other two don't need the extra check because the implementation of
>> pidfd_open() can do it well.  For 3rd test, I want to check the support of
>> pidfs_open() before doing fork().
>
> What I meant was that the solution needs to be consistent across
Hi Viresh,

Current change can do correct check for pidfd_open[1-3] so don't need to 
add redundant check.

> tests. For example, with the current change the run() function will
> run for all tests in pidfd_open02.c and print the message that syscall
> isn't supported, while it would be better to run it only once in setup
> and get done with it. i.e. 1 message instead of 3 similar ones.
>

Are you sure?

Triggering first tst_brk(TCONF, ...) will break the whole test instead 
of a subtest.

Thanks,
Xiao Yang