[LTP] ❌ FAIL: Waiting for review: Test report for kernel 5.6.14-dbf782f.cki (stable-queue)
Li Wang
liwan@redhat.com
Tue May 26 05:22:58 CEST 2020
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:15 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ...
> > > > s390x:
> > > > ❌ LTP
> > >
> > > @Li, any thoughts on hugetlb TBROKs here? I thought you said
> > > 'request_hugepages'
> > > was not supposed to be hard test requirement.
> > >
> >
> > The hugemmap05.c doesn't goes the new 'request_hugepages' way in the huge
> > page reserving. it tries to reserve 128 hpages and overcommits 192 hpages
> > in hard coding, and probably touch the memory available uplimit on s390x.
> > static long size = 128, length = 384;
> > ...
> > addr = SAFE_MMAP(ADDR, (length / 2 * hugepagesize), PROTECTION, FLAGS,
> fd,
> > 0);
> >
> > We could convert this to use the new request_hugepages API and do the
> > requested number of huge page checking at setup() to make sure the system
> > only running in a reasonable situation.
>
> Sorry, I didn't make it clear I was talking about hugemmap06. The patch is
> OK,
> since it makes both use request_hugepages API. But should we also do
> something
> with this TBROK?
>
It seems unkind and useless to exit with TBROK when failed to reserve with
80% max_hpages again. I'm thinking if it could be directly replaced by
TCONF to skip the whole test?
--- a/lib/tst_hugepage.c
+++ b/lib/tst_hugepage.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ unsigned long tst_request_hugepages(unsigned long hpages)
SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(PATH_NR_HPAGES, "%lu", tst_hugepages);
SAFE_FILE_SCANF(PATH_NR_HPAGES, "%lu", &val);
if (val != tst_hugepages)
- tst_brk(TBROK, "nr_hugepages = %lu, but expect %lu", val,
tst_hugepages);
+ tst_brk(TCONF, "Not enough hugepages for testing.");
tst_res(TINFO, "%lu hugepage(s) reserved", tst_hugepages);
out:
>
> tst_hugepage.c:46: BROK: nr_hugepages = 171, but expect 255
>
>
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20200526/1ba02bf6/attachment.htm>
More information about the ltp
mailing list