[LTP] [PATCH v2] sycalls: select03: Make nfds use the correct value
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Thu Nov 5 13:34:25 CET 2020
Hi!
> When running select03 with runltp in /opt/ltp, this case failed as below:
> select03.c:52: TFAIL: Invalid readfds: select() passed unexpectedly with 0
> select03.c:52: TFAIL: Invalid writefds: select() passed unexpectedly with 0
> select03.c:52: TFAIL: Invalid exceptfds: select() passed unexpectedly with 0
>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Feiyu Zhu <zhufy.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/select/select03.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/select/select03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/select/select03.c
> index ca1b7a5..099b622 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/select/select03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/select/select03.c
> @@ -29,21 +29,21 @@ static struct tcases {
> struct timeval **timeout;
> int exp_errno;
> } tests[] = {
> - { "Negative nfds", -1, &preadfds_reg, &pwritefds_reg, &nullfds, &valid_to, EINVAL },
> - { "Invalid readfds", 6, &pfds_closed, &pwritefds_reg, &nullfds, &valid_to, EBADF },
> - { "Invalid writefds", 6, &preadfds_reg, &pfds_closed, &nullfds, &valid_to, EBADF },
> - { "Invalid exceptfds", 6, &preadfds_reg, &pwritefds_reg, &pfds_closed, &valid_to, EBADF },
> - { "Faulty readfds", 6, &faulty_fds, &pwritefds_reg, &nullfds, &valid_to, EFAULT },
> - { "Faulty writefds", 6, &preadfds_reg, &faulty_fds, &nullfds, &valid_to, EFAULT },
> - { "Faulty exceptfds", 6, &preadfds_reg, &pwritefds_reg, &faulty_fds, &valid_to, EFAULT },
> - { "Faulty timeout", 6, &preadfds_reg, &pwritefds_reg, &nullfds, &invalid_to, EFAULT },
> + { "Negative nfds", 0, &preadfds_reg, &pwritefds_reg, &nullfds, &valid_to, EINVAL },
> + { "Invalid readfds", 1, &pfds_closed, &pwritefds_reg, &nullfds, &valid_to, EBADF },
> + { "Invalid writefds", 1, &preadfds_reg, &pfds_closed, &nullfds, &valid_to, EBADF },
> + { "Invalid exceptfds", 1, &preadfds_reg, &pwritefds_reg, &pfds_closed, &valid_to, EBADF },
> + { "Faulty readfds", 1, &faulty_fds, &pwritefds_reg, &nullfds, &valid_to, EFAULT },
> + { "Faulty writefds", 1, &preadfds_reg, &faulty_fds, &nullfds, &valid_to, EFAULT },
> + { "Faulty exceptfds", 1, &preadfds_reg, &pwritefds_reg, &faulty_fds, &valid_to, EFAULT },
> + { "Faulty timeout", 1, &preadfds_reg, &pwritefds_reg, &nullfds, &invalid_to, EFAULT },
Can we make it a pointer to integer value set in the setup instead?
> };
>
> static void run(unsigned int n)
> {
> struct tcases *tc = &tests[n];
>
> - TEST(do_select_faulty_to(tc->nfds, *tc->readfds, *tc->writefds,
> + TEST(do_select_faulty_to(tc->nfds ? fd[1] + 1 : -1, *tc->readfds, *tc->writefds,
> *tc->exceptfds, *tc->timeout,
> tc->timeout == &invalid_to));
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list