[LTP] [PATCH v4] syscalls/ptrace11: Add test for tracing init process
Yang Xu
xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
Fri Nov 20 04:16:33 CET 2020
Before kernel 2.6.26, ptrace can't trace init process and will get
EPERM error. Now, it should succeed when we have enough privileges.
Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
runtest/syscalls | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/.gitignore | 1 +
testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace11.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace11.c
diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
index a5363277f..be5e1e76c 100644
--- a/runtest/syscalls
+++ b/runtest/syscalls
@@ -1000,6 +1000,7 @@ ptrace07 ptrace07
ptrace08 ptrace08
ptrace09 ptrace09
ptrace10 ptrace10
+ptrace11 ptrace11
pwrite01 pwrite01
pwrite02 pwrite02
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/.gitignore
index 34be5148f..01cbc6072 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/.gitignore
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
/ptrace08
/ptrace09
/ptrace10
+/ptrace11
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace11.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace11.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..daaadcd3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace11.c
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
+ *
+ * Before kernel 2.6.26, we can't trace init(1) process and ptrace() will
+ * get EPERM error. This case just check whether we can trace init(1)
+ * process and doesn't trigger error.
+ */
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
+#include <pwd.h>
+#include <config.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include "ptrace.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+static void verify_ptrace(void)
+{
+ TEST(ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, 1, NULL, NULL));
+ if (TST_RET == 0)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "ptrace() traces init process successfully");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
+ "ptrace() returns %ld, failed unexpectedly", TST_RET);
+
+ /*
+ * As ptrace(2) man-page said, when using PTRACE_ATTACH option, the
+ * tracee is sent a SIGSTOP, but will not necessarily have stopped
+ * by the completion of this call. Use waitpid(2) to wait for the
+ * tracee into stop. Otherwise it may get ESRCH error.
+ * As waitpid(2) man-pages said, status for traced children which have
+ * stopped is provided even if WUNTRACED option is not specified.
+ * So using 0 option is enough.
+ */
+ SAFE_WAITPID(1, NULL, 0);
+
+ SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_DETACH, 1, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = verify_ptrace,
+ .needs_root = 1,
+};
--
2.23.0
More information about the ltp
mailing list