[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] syscalls: shift to time() if __NR_time not support
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Tue Nov 24 08:57:47 CET 2020
Hi Xu,
Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I have seen this patchset, Can we use a function to check whether kernel
>
Yes, we can, I was even thinking to define a global MACRO can check
any syscall not only __NR_time.
(maybe we can achieve it for other tests)
But for this kind of case, I'd not suggest using that MACRO/function
to check __NR_time, because the test will perform twice at the moment
for the __NR_time syscall if it supporting(first time for support checking,
second time for real invoking).
Considering this is a time comparing test, that makes our seconds
more inaccurate to compare.
supports time syscall (like time_supported_by_kernel()) in setup
> and then we use time() - !return value in verify funtion?
>
Though we check the syscall in setup(), shouldn't we also export a variable
to record the result we checked? That does not make things be simple too.
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20201124/f2bb2de4/attachment.htm>
More information about the ltp
mailing list