[LTP] [PATCH 01/10] lib: Introduce more TEST_* macros

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> > I agree to add an expected value check for TEST_PASS(), e.g
> > 
> > #define TEST_PASS(SCALL, EXPECTED, ...)
> 
> I would rather keep this simple case as it is, since many function
> return zero on success and added more specialized functions if needed as
> it was done with TEST_FD()

Is anyone against pushing this initial patchset as it is?

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz