[LTP] [PATCH v3 0/4] TPM 2.0 fixes in IMA tests
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Thu Oct 1 14:01:25 CEST 2020
Hi Jarkko,
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 07:53:14AM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Jarkko,
> > > Hi, is there something specific I should look at in this patch set?
> > I'm sorry to bother you with LTP specific code. Can you have a quick look if I
> > didn't overlook anything obvious in reading PCR files (read_pcr_tpm*())?
> > I'm surprised that it's working on my TPM 2.0 which does not export
> > /sys/kernel/security/tpm0/binary_bios_measurements (using evmctl).
> Thank you, this was actually really important remark and reminder.
> OK so I think James' patch is stuck because of me, i.e.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20200911114820.GB6877@linux.intel.com/
> I'm sorry about this. The final final conclusion is that the way it
> exports PCRs is just fine.
That's a great, thank you for going to upstream James' patch.
James, thanks for implementing it!
> Can you test this version?
Sure, I'll test it next week.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11759729/
> I can then add reviewd-by and apply it and you don't have to do any sort
> of stupid hacks.
I'll need to keep these hacks for older kernels, but it's great that there is a
better solution.
Other thing: do you know anybody practically uses more TPM devices in single
machine? I'm asking that I work with tpm0 in ima_tpm.sh, but maybe I should
allow user to redefine it to choose different device (or even run tests for all
available devices).
Kind regards,
Petr
> /Jarkkko
More information about the ltp
mailing list