[LTP] [PATCH] syscall/ptrace08: Simplify the test.
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
cascardo@canonical.com
Fri Sep 4 15:21:21 CEST 2020
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 01:58:17PM +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> The original test was attempting to crash the kernel by setting a
> breakpoint on do_debug kernel function which, when triggered, caused an
> infinite loop in the kernel. The problem with this approach is that
> kernel internal function names are not stable at all and the name was
> changed recently, which made the test fail for no good reason.
>
> So this patch changes the test to read the breakpoint address back
> instead, which also means that we can drop the /proc/kallsyms parsing as
> well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CC: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Hi, Cyril.
This is failing on our 4.4 and 4.15 kernels, though they passed with the
previous test and have commit f67b15037a7a applied.
So, this is dependent on some other behavior/commit that has changed. It passes
on 5.4, for example. I'll try to investigate further.
Cascardo.
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c | 120 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c
> index 591aa0dd2..5587f0bbb 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace08.c
> @@ -5,8 +5,17 @@
> *
> * CVE-2018-1000199
> *
> - * Test error handling when ptrace(POKEUSER) modifies debug registers.
> - * Even if the call returns error, it may create breakpoint in kernel code.
> + * Test error handling when ptrace(POKEUSER) modified x86 debug registers even
> + * when the call returned error.
> + *
> + * When the bug was present we could create breakpoint in the kernel code,
> + * which shoudn't be possible at all. The original CVE caused a kernel crash by
> + * setting a breakpoint on do_debug kernel function which, when triggered,
> + * caused an infinite loop. However we do not have to crash the kernel in order
> + * to assert if kernel has been fixed or not. All we have to do is to try to
> + * set a breakpoint, on any kernel address, then read it back and check if the
> + * value has been set or not.
> + *
> * Kernel crash partially fixed in:
> *
> * commit f67b15037a7a50c57f72e69a6d59941ad90a0f0f
> @@ -26,69 +35,42 @@
> #include "tst_safe_stdio.h"
>
> #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> -#define SYMNAME_SIZE 256
> -#define KERNEL_SYM "do_debug"
>
> -static unsigned long break_addr;
> static pid_t child_pid;
>
> -static void setup(void)
> -{
> - int fcount;
> - char endl, symname[256];
> - FILE *fr = SAFE_FOPEN("/proc/kallsyms", "r");
> -
> - /* Find address of do_debug() in /proc/kallsyms */
> - do {
> - fcount = fscanf(fr, "%lx %*c %255s%c", &break_addr, symname,
> - &endl);
> -
> - if (fcount <= 0 && feof(fr))
> - break;
> -
> - if (fcount < 2) {
> - fclose(fr);
> - tst_brk(TBROK, "Unexpected data in /proc/kallsyms %d",
> - fcount);
> - }
> -
> - if (fcount >= 3 && endl != '\n')
> - while (!feof(fr) && fgetc(fr) != '\n');
> - } while (!feof(fr) && strcmp(symname, KERNEL_SYM));
> -
> - SAFE_FCLOSE(fr);
> -
> - if (strcmp(symname, KERNEL_SYM))
> - tst_brk(TBROK, "Cannot find address of kernel symbol \"%s\"",
> - KERNEL_SYM);
> -
> - if (!break_addr)
> - tst_brk(TCONF, "Addresses in /proc/kallsyms are hidden");
> -
> - tst_res(TINFO, "Kernel symbol \"%s\" found at 0x%lx", KERNEL_SYM,
> - break_addr);
> -}
> +#if defined(__x86_64__)
> +# define KERN_ADDR_MIN 0xffff800000000000
> +# define KERN_ADDR_MAX 0xffffffffffffffff
> +# define KERN_ADDR_BITS 64
> +#elif defined(__i386__)
> +# define KERN_ADDR_MIN 0xc0000000
> +# define KERN_ADDR_MAX 0xffffffff
> +# define KERN_ADDR_BITS 32
> +#endif
>
> -static void debug_trap(void)
> +static void setup(void)
> {
> - /* x86 instruction INT1 */
> - asm volatile (".byte 0xf1");
> + /*
> + * When running in compat mode we can't pass 64 address to ptrace so we
> + * have to skip the test.
> + */
> + if (tst_kernel_bits() != KERN_ADDR_BITS)
> + tst_brk(TCONF, "Cannot pass 64bit kernel address in compat mode");
> }
>
> static void child_main(void)
> {
> raise(SIGSTOP);
> - /* wait for SIGCONT from parent */
> - debug_trap();
> exit(0);
> }
>
> -static void run(void)
> +static void ptrace_try_kern_addr(unsigned long kern_addr)
> {
> int status;
> - pid_t child;
>
> - child = child_pid = SAFE_FORK();
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Trying address 0x%lx", kern_addr);
> +
> + child_pid = SAFE_FORK();
>
> if (!child_pid)
> child_main();
> @@ -103,22 +85,41 @@ static void run(void)
> (void *)offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[7]), (void *)1);
>
> /* Return value intentionally ignored here */
> - ptrace(PTRACE_POKEUSER, child_pid,
> + TEST(ptrace(PTRACE_POKEUSER, child_pid,
> (void *)offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[0]),
> - (void *)break_addr);
> + (void *)kern_addr));
> +
> + if (TST_RET != -1) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "ptrace() breakpoint with kernel addr succeeded");
> + } else {
> + if (TST_ERR == EINVAL) {
> + tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO,
> + "ptrace() breakpoint with kernel addr failed");
> + } else {
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
> + "ptrace() breakpoint on kernel addr should return EINVAL, got");
> + }
> + }
> +
> + unsigned long addr;
> +
> + addr = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, child_pid,
> + (void*)offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[0]), NULL);
> +
> + if (addr == kern_addr)
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Was able to set breakpoint on kernel addr");
>
> SAFE_PTRACE(PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, NULL, NULL);
> SAFE_KILL(child_pid, SIGCONT);
> child_pid = 0;
> + tst_reap_children();
> +}
>
> - if (SAFE_WAITPID(child, &status, 0) != child)
> - tst_brk(TBROK, "Received event from unexpected PID");
> -
> - if (!WIFSIGNALED(status))
> - tst_brk(TBROK, "Received unexpected event from child");
> -
> - tst_res(TPASS, "Child killed by %s", tst_strsig(WTERMSIG(status)));
> - tst_res(TPASS, "We're still here. Nothing bad happened, probably.");
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> + ptrace_try_kern_addr(KERN_ADDR_MIN);
> + ptrace_try_kern_addr(KERN_ADDR_MAX);
> + ptrace_try_kern_addr(KERN_ADDR_MIN + (KERN_ADDR_MAX - KERN_ADDR_MIN)/2);
> }
>
> static void cleanup(void)
> @@ -133,7 +134,6 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> .setup = setup,
> .cleanup = cleanup,
> .forks_child = 1,
> - .taint_check = TST_TAINT_W | TST_TAINT_D,
> .tags = (const struct tst_tag[]) {
> {"linux-git", "f67b15037a7a"},
> {"CVE", "2018-1000199"},
> --
> 2.26.2
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
More information about the ltp
mailing list