[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] io_destroy01: TCONF when unsupported

[Yang Xu]

Hi Petr
Why not using kconfig in tst_test struct.

Best Regards
Yang Xu
> to fix test on kernel built without CONFIG_AIO=y.
>
> Cleanup: use return instead of else, join string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel<pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> simple patch, but can wait after release.
> I can move cleanup into separate commit.
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_destroy/io_destroy01.c | 13 +++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_destroy/io_destroy01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_destroy/io_destroy01.c
> index 560d7b3fb..5c5c59335 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_destroy/io_destroy01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_destroy/io_destroy01.c
> @@ -32,14 +32,19 @@ static void verify_io_destroy(void)
>   		return;
>   	}
>
> +	if (TST_RET == -ENOSYS) {
> +		tst_res(TCONF, "io_destroy() not supported");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (TST_RET == -EINVAL) {
>   		tst_res(TPASS,
>   			"io_destroy() failed as expected, returned -EINVAL");
> -	} else {
> -		tst_res(TFAIL, "io_destroy() failed unexpectedly, "
> -			"returned -%s expected -EINVAL",
> -			tst_strerrno(-TST_RET));
> +		return;
>   	}
> +
> +	tst_res(TFAIL, "io_destroy() failed unexpectedly, returned -%s expected -EINVAL",
> +		tst_strerrno(-TST_RET));
>   }
>
>   static struct tst_test test = {