[LTP] [PATCH] controllers/cpuset_base_ops_testset.sh: Accept either 0 or -EINVAL when passing '0-'
Xiao Yang
yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com
Wed Sep 30 14:27:59 CEST 2020
On 2020/9/30 18:47, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> When we write '0-' to cpuset.cpus/cpuset.mems, new bitmap_parselist()
>> in kernel(e.g. newer than v4.2) treats it as an invalid value and old
>> one treats it as a valid '0':
>> -------------------------------------------
>> on v5.8.0:
>> # echo 0-> cpuset.cpus
>> -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>> # echo 0-> cpuset.mems
>> -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
>>
>> on v4.0.0:
>> # echo '0-'>cpuset.cpus
>> # cat cpuset.cpus
>> 0
>> # echo '0-'>cpuset.mems
>> # cat cpuset.cpus
>> 0
>> -------------------------------------------
>> Note: commit d9282cb66353b changes the behavior.
>>
>> Drop the check of kernel version and accept either 0 or -EINVAL
>> because the change of behavior can be backported into old kernel.
> Why can't we just simply adjust the kernel check, it looks like the
> commit you mentioned was added to 4.3 so it should be fixed by changing
> the line to:
>
> if tst_kvcmp -lt "4.3 RHEL6:2.6.32"; then
>
> We want to at least keep the check for kernels newer than 4.3 just to
> make sure that kernel keeps rejecting the '0-' invalid value.
Hi Cyril,
Thanks for your reply. :-)
1) I still got '0' value instead of -EINVAL on Centos 6.10(2.6.32-754)
so not sure why we have the wrong kernel check before.
Perhaps, is there anothe older kernel commit to change the behavior
as well?
2) I don't think that kernel check is enough because the change of
behavior may be backported into old kernel.
How about removing the combination directly as Richard suggested on #695.
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20200930/d1be3b57/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the ltp
mailing list