[LTP] [PATCH] Ignore ntfs file system

Petr Vorel pvorel@suse.cz
Tue Apr 27 21:14:59 CEST 2021


Hi,

> > > > Shouldn't "ntfs" *replace* "fuse"?
> > > Can't replace fuse.
> > Not sure if we understand each other: I mean add "ntfs" and *remove* "fuse",
> > as "fuse" is now redundant when we whitelist ntfs (see
> > tst_get_supported_fs_types()), unless there is problem with other fuse
> > filesystems. I tested with CONFIG_FUSE_FS=m CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m.

> > But maybe removing "fuse" should be a separate step.

> I can understand what you mean, but I can't remove the fuse. If the fuse is
> removed and the kernel is not configured with CONFIG_EXFAT_FS=m, it will
> cause the test exfat to fail.

You're right, I didn't notice I tested it without mount.exfat. Sorry for being
slow. Interesting that while NTFS kernel module does not work on the test, exfat
from Samsung does.

Anyway merged. Thanks!

Kind regards,
Petr


More information about the ltp mailing list