[LTP] [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR
Amir Goldstein
amir73il@gmail.com
Tue Aug 3 10:56:31 CEST 2021
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:47 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<krisman@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Verify the FID provided in the event. If the testcase has a null inode,
> this is assumed to be a superblock error (i.e. null FH).
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
> ---
> .../kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> index fd5cfb8744f1..d8d788ae685f 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify20.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@
>
> #define FAN_EVENT_INFO_TYPE_ERROR 4
>
> +#ifndef FILEID_INVALID
> +#define FILEID_INVALID 0xff
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef FILEID_INO32_GEN
> +#define FILEID_INO32_GEN 1
> +#endif
> +
> struct fanotify_event_info_error {
> struct fanotify_event_info_header hdr;
> __s32 error;
> @@ -57,6 +65,9 @@ static const struct test_case {
> char *name;
> int error;
> unsigned int error_count;
> +
> + /* inode can be null for superblock errors */
> + unsigned int *inode;
Any reason not to use fanotify_fid_t * like fanotify16.c?
Thanks,
Amir.
More information about the ltp
mailing list