[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/readv02: Convert to new API and merge readv03 into readv02.
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Tue Aug 3 15:43:49 CEST 2021
Hi!
> - /* Test case #1 */
> +static struct iovec rd_iovec[MAX_IOVEC] = {
> {buf2, -1},
> {(buf2 + CHUNK), CHUNK},
> {(buf2 + CHUNK * 2), CHUNK},
> -
> - /* Test case #2 */
> {(buf2 + CHUNK * 3), G_1},
> {(buf2 + CHUNK * 4), G_1},
> {(buf2 + CHUNK * 5), G_1},
> -
> - /* Test case #3 */
> {(caddr_t) - 1, CHUNK},
> {(buf2 + CHUNK * 6), CHUNK},
> {(buf2 + CHUNK * 8), CHUNK},
> -
> - /* Test case #4 */
> - {(buf2 + CHUNK * 9), CHUNK}
> + {(buf2 + CHUNK * 9), CHUNK},
> + {buf1, K_1}
> };
It would be much easier to read the code if we split this iovec so that
each test has it's own structure. There is absolutely no reason to keep
them all together like that.
I.e. we will have it as:
static struct iovec invalid_iovec[] = {
{buf, -1},
{buf + CHUNK, CHUNK},
{buf + 2*CHUNK, CHUNK},
};
static struct iovec large_iovec[] = {
{buf2, G_1},
{buf2 + CHUNK, G_1},
{buf2 + CHUNK*2, G_1},
};
static struct iovec efault_iovec[] = {
{NULL, CHUNK},
{buf + CHUNK, CHUNK},
{buf + 2*CHUNK, CHUNK},
};
static struct iovec valid_iovec[] = {
{buf, CHUNK},
};
Also we can use the valid iovec for both EISDIR and EBADFD.
static void setup(void)
{
...
efault_iovec[0].iov_base = tst_get_bad_addr(NULL);
...
}
Also I do not think that we need three buffers, the buf3 is completely
unused and there is no point in having special buffer for badfd test
either.
> -char f_name[K_1];
> -
> -int fd[4];
> -char *buf_list[NBUFS];
> -
> -char *TCID = "readv02";
> -int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> -
> -char *bad_addr = 0;
> +static struct tcase {
> + int *fd;
> + void *buf;
> + int count;
> + int exp_error;
> +} tcases[] = {
> + {&fd[0], rd_iovec, 1, EINVAL},
> + {&fd[1], rd_iovec + 6, 3, EFAULT},
> + {&fd[2], rd_iovec + 10, -1, EINVAL},
> + {&fd[3], rd_iovec + 10, 1, EISDIR},
> + {&badfd, rd_iovec + 9, 3, EBADF},
> +};
>
> -int init_buffs(char **);
> -int fill_mem(char *, int, int);
> -long l_seek(int, long, int);
> -char *getenv();
> -void setup();
> -void cleanup();
>
> -int main(int ac, char **av)
> +void fill_mem(char *c_ptr, int c1, int c2)
> {
> - int lc;
> -
> - tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
> -
> - setup();
> + int count;
>
> - /* The following loop checks looping state if -i option given */
> - for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> + for (count = 1; count <= K_1 / CHUNK; count++) {
> + if (count & 0x01) /* if odd */
> + memset(c_ptr, c1, CHUNK);
> + else /* if even */
> + memset(c_ptr, c2, CHUNK);
> + }
> + return;
> +}
>
> - /* reset tst_count in case we are looping */
> - tst_count = 0;
> +void init_buffs(char *pbufs[])
> +{
> + int i;
>
> -//test1:
> - if (readv(fd[0], rd_iovec, 1) < 0) {
> - if (errno != EINVAL) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "readv() set an illegal errno:"
> - " expected: EINVAL, got %d", errno);
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TPASS, "got EINVAL");
> - }
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Error: readv returned a positive "
> - "value");
> + for (i = 0; pbufs[i] != NULL; i++) {
> + switch (i) {
> + case 0:
> + case 1:
> + fill_mem(pbufs[i], 0, 1);
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + fill_mem(pbufs[i], 1, 0);
> + break;
> + default:
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "Error in init_buffs function");
> }
> + }
> + return;
> +}
>
> -//test2:
> - l_seek(fd[0], CHUNK * 6, 0);
> - if (readv(fd[0], (rd_iovec + 6), 3) < 0) {
> - if (errno != EFAULT) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "expected errno = EFAULT, "
> - "got %d", errno);
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TPASS, "got EFAULT");
> - }
> - if (memcmp((buf_list[0] + CHUNK * 6),
> - (buf_list[1] + CHUNK * 6), CHUNK * 3) != 0) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Error: readv() partially "
> - "overlaid buf[2]");
> - }
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Error: readv returned a positive "
> - "value");
> - }
> +static void verify_readv(unsigned int n)
> +{
> + struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
>
> -//test3:
> - if (readv(fd[1], (rd_iovec + 9), 1) < 0) {
> - if (errno != EBADF) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "expected errno = EBADF, "
> - "got %d", errno);
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TPASS, "got EBADF");
> - }
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Error: readv returned a positive "
> - "value");
> - }
> + TST_EXP_FAIL2(readv(*tc->fd, tc->buf, tc->count), tc->exp_error,
> + "readv(%d, %p, %d)", *tc->fd, tc->buf, tc->count);
>
> -//test4:
> - l_seek(fd[0], CHUNK * 10, 0);
> - if (readv(fd[0], (rd_iovec + 10), -1) < 0) {
> - if (errno != EINVAL) {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "expected errno = EINVAL, "
> - "got %d", errno);
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TPASS, "got EINVAL");
> - }
> - } else {
> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "Error: readv returned a positive "
> - "value");
> + if (tc->exp_error == EFAULT) {
> + if (memcmp((buf_list[0] + CHUNK * 6),
> + (buf_list[1] + CHUNK * 6), CHUNK * 3)) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Error: readv() partially overlaid buf[2]");
> }
> -
> }
> - close(fd[0]);
> - close(fd[1]);
> - cleanup();
> - tst_exit();
> -
> }
>
> -/*
> - * setup() - performs all ONE TIME setup for this test.
> - */
> void setup(void)
> {
> - int nbytes;
> -
> - tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
> -
> - TEST_PAUSE;
> -
> - /* make a temporary directory and cd to it */
> - tst_tmpdir();
> + int i;
>
> buf_list[0] = buf1;
> buf_list[1] = buf2;
> @@ -201,84 +133,37 @@ void setup(void)
>
> init_buffs(buf_list);
>
> - sprintf(f_name, "%s.%d", DATA_FILE, getpid());
> + for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> + fd[i] = SAFE_OPEN(TEST_FILE[i], O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0666);
> + SAFE_WRITE(1, fd[i], buf_list[2], K_1);
>
> - if ((fd[0] = open(f_name, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0666)) < 0) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "open failed: fname = %s, "
> - "errno = %d", f_name, errno);
> - } else {
> - if ((nbytes = write(fd[0], buf_list[2], K_1)) != K_1) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "write failed: nbytes "
> - "= %d " "errno = %d", nbytes, errno);
> - }
> - }
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd[i]);
>
> - SAFE_CLOSE(cleanup, fd[0]);
> -
> - if ((fd[0] = open(f_name, O_RDONLY, 0666)) < 0) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "open failed: fname = %s, "
> - "errno = %d", f_name, errno);
> + fd[i] = SAFE_OPEN(TEST_FILE[i], O_RDONLY, 0666);
> }
> + SAFE_LSEEK(fd[1], CHUNK * 6, 0);
> + SAFE_LSEEK(fd[2], CHUNK * 10, 0);
Does these readv calls actually read anyting?
Because as far as I can tell they just fail without actually reading
anything, so there is no point in intializing the buffers and also there
is no point in having three different files opened for the test either.
> - fd[1] = -1; /* Invalid file descriptor */
> + rd_iovec[6].iov_base = tst_get_bad_addr(NULL);
>
> - bad_addr = mmap(0, 1, PROT_NONE,
> - MAP_PRIVATE_EXCEPT_UCLINUX | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0, 0);
> - if (bad_addr == MAP_FAILED) {
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "mmap failed");
> - }
> - rd_iovec[6].iov_base = bad_addr;
> + SAFE_MKDIR(TEST_DIR, MODES);
> + fd[3] = SAFE_OPEN(TEST_DIR, O_RDONLY);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * cleanup() - performs all ONE TIME cleanup for this test at
> - * completion or premature exit.
> - */
> -void cleanup(void)
> -{
> - SAFE_UNLINK(NULL, f_name);
> - tst_rmdir();
> -
> -}
> -
> -int init_buffs(char *pbufs[])
> +static void cleanup(void)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; pbufs[i] != NULL; i++) {
> - switch (i) {
> - case 0:
> - /*FALLTHROUGH*/ case 1:
> - fill_mem(pbufs[i], 0, 1);
> - break;
> -
> - case 2:
> - fill_mem(pbufs[i], 1, 0);
> - break;
> -
> - default:
> - tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Error in init_buffs()");
> - }
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -int fill_mem(char *c_ptr, int c1, int c2)
> -{
> - int count;
> -
> - for (count = 1; count <= K_1 / CHUNK; count++) {
> - if (count & 0x01) { /* if odd */
> - memset(c_ptr, c1, CHUNK);
> - } else { /* if even */
> - memset(c_ptr, c2, CHUNK);
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + if (fd[i] > 0)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd[i]);
> }
> - return 0;
> }
>
> -long l_seek(int fdesc, long offset, int whence)
> -{
> - SAFE_LSEEK(cleanup, fdesc, offset, whence);
> - return 0;
> -}
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .test = verify_readv,
> +};
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list