[LTP] [PATCH] epoll_creat01: Replace TST_PASS with TST_RET
Xie Ziyao
ziyaoxie@outlook.com
Fri Aug 27 14:03:47 CEST 2021
Hi,
> In TST_EXP_FD(), the value of TST_RET is the returned fd, not TST_PASS.
>
> Fixes: 081f940b2df00 ("epoll_create: Add test for epoll_create01")
> Signed-off-by: Xie Ziyao <ziyaoxie@outlook.com>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/epoll_create/epoll_create01.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/epoll_create/epoll_create01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/epoll_create/epoll_create01.c
> index 54fd0810d..29ac3763e 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/epoll_create/epoll_create01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/epoll_create/epoll_create01.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,8 @@ static void run(unsigned int n)
> {
> TST_EXP_FD(tst_syscall(__NR_epoll_create, tc[n]), "epoll_create(%d)", tc[n]);
>
> - if (!TST_PASS)
> - return;
> - SAFE_CLOSE(TST_PASS);
> + if (TST_RET)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(TST_RET);
This patch fixes the incorrect use of TST_PASS in commit 081f940
("epoll_create: Add test for epoll_create01"), which I noticed when
reviewing the merged commit.
Sorry for this minor mistake.
> }
>
> static struct tst_test test = {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Xie Ziyao
E-mail: ziyaoxie@outlook.com
More information about the ltp
mailing list