[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/write06: Add new test
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Tue Dec 7 14:51:07 CET 2021
Hi!
> Signed-off-by: Dai Shili <daisl.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> ---
> runtest/syscalls | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/.gitignore | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write06.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write06.c
>
> diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
> index bcf3d56..32fcda4 100644
> --- a/runtest/syscalls
> +++ b/runtest/syscalls
> @@ -1699,6 +1699,7 @@ write02 write02
> write03 write03
> write04 write04
> write05 write05
> +write06 write06
>
> writev01 writev01
> writev02 writev02
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/.gitignore
> index 7f36194..8529aae 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/.gitignore
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/.gitignore
> @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
> /write03
> /write04
> /write05
> +/write06
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write06.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write06.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c62a266
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/write/write06.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Dai Shili <daisl.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + *
> + * Test the write() system call with O_APPEND.
> + *
> + * Writing 2k data to the file, close it and reopen it with O_APPEND.
> + * Verify that the file size is 3k and offset is moved to the end of the file.
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <inttypes.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "tst_safe_prw.h"
> +
> +#define K1 1024
> +#define K2 (K1 * 2)
> +#define K3 (K1 * 3)
> +#define DATA_FILE "write06_file"
> +
> +static int fd = -1;
> +static char *write_buf[2];
> +
> +static void l_seek(int fdesc, off_t offset, int whence, off_t checkoff)
> +{
> + off_t offloc;
> +
> + offloc = SAFE_LSEEK(fdesc, offset, whence);
> + if (offloc != checkoff) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "%" PRId64 " = lseek(%d, %" PRId64 ", %d) != %" PRId64,
> + (int64_t)offloc, fdesc, (int64_t)offset, whence, (int64_t)checkoff);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_write(void)
> +{
> + int fail = 0;
> + struct stat statbuf;
> +
> + fd = SAFE_OPEN(DATA_FILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0666);
> + SAFE_WRITE(1, fd, write_buf[0], K2);
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> +
> + fd = SAFE_OPEN(DATA_FILE, O_RDWR | O_APPEND, 0666);
^
No need to pass
mode without
O_CREAT
> + SAFE_FSTAT(fd, &statbuf);
> + if (statbuf.st_size != K2) {
> + fail++;
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "file size is %ld != K2", statbuf.st_size);
> + }
> +
> + l_seek(fd, K1, SEEK_SET, K1);
Why do we do the seek here?
Wouldn't it make much more sense just to write the write_buf[1] then
check that the st_size is K3?
That way we would check that O_APPEND opened file has correct position
associated with the file descriptor.
> + SAFE_WRITE(1, fd, write_buf[1], K1);
> + l_seek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR, K3);
And here as well, why the seek? This is actually the place that
increases the size not the write() as it should have been.
> + SAFE_FSTAT(fd, &statbuf);
> + if (statbuf.st_size != K3) {
> + fail++;
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "file size is %ld != K3", statbuf.st_size);
> + }
Really the whole test should do:
open(FILE, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0666)
write()
close()
open(FILE, O_RDWR | O_APPEND)
check size
write()
check size
close()
open(FILE, O_RDONLY);
read()
verify data
close()
> + if (!fail)
> + tst_res(TPASS, "O_APPEND test passed.");
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + write_buf[0] = SAFE_MALLOC(K2);
> + memset(write_buf[0], 0, K2);
> + write_buf[1] = SAFE_MALLOC(K1);
> + memset(write_buf[0], 1, K1);
^
1
Also can you please switch these two buffers to a guarded buffers?
See:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/C-Test-API#131-guarded-buffers
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> + free(write_buf[0]);
> + free(write_buf[1]);
> +
> + if (fd > -1)
Probably fd != -1 would be a bit clearer.
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> +
> + SAFE_UNLINK(DATA_FILE);
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .test_all = verify_write,
> +};
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list