[LTP] [PATCH v3, 2/2] cgroup/cgroup_regression_test: Fix umount failure
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Mon Jul 19 07:59:54 CEST 2021
> Hi Leo
> > The test sequence
> > mount -t cgroup -o<controllers> <path>
> > mkdir<path>/<dir>
> > rmdir<path>/<dir>
> > umount<path>
> > mount -t cgroup -o<controllers> <path>
> > would easily fail at the last mount with -EBUSY on certain platform.
> > The reason is that this test sequence would have the chance of
> > missing a release code path when doing rmdir and umount.
> > Adding a little delay between "rmdir" and "umount" could fix the problem,
> > so use tst_umount API instead of umount in "rmdir, umount" sequence.
> > Fixes: #839
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang<ycliang@andestech.com>
> > ---
> > .../controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh
> > index 1f7f3820e..056166f11 100755
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup/cgroup_regression_test.sh
> > @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ test2()
> > fi
> > rmdir cgroup/0 cgroup/1
> > - umount cgroup/
> With adding a comment like
> # Avoid possible EBUSY error
> so when other converts this case into new api, they will keep to use
> tst_umount.
+1
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
> Reviewed-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
> > + tst_umount cgroup/
> > }
> > #---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ test3()
> > wait $pid2 2>/dev/null
> > rmdir $cpu_subsys_path/0 2> /dev/null
> > - umount cgroup/ 2> /dev/null
> > + tst_umount cgroup/ 2> /dev/null
> > check_kernel_bug
> > }
> > @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ test4()
> > mount -t cgroup -o none,name=foo cgroup cgroup/
> > mkdir cgroup/0
> > rmdir cgroup/0
> > - umount cgroup/
> > + tst_umount cgroup/
> here as well
> > if dmesg | grep -q "MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low"; then
> > tst_res TFAIL "lockdep BUG was found"
> > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ test5()
> > mount -t cgroup none cgroup 2> /dev/null
> > mkdir cgroup/0
> > rmdir cgroup/0
> > - umount cgroup/ 2> /dev/null
> > + tst_umount cgroup/ 2> /dev/null
> > check_kernel_bug
> > }
> > @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ test6()
> > mount -t cgroup -o ns xxx cgroup/> /dev/null 2>&1
> > rmdir cgroup/[1-9]*> /dev/null 2>&1
> > - umount cgroup/
> > + tst_umount cgroup/
> here as well
> > check_kernel_bug
> > }
More information about the ltp
mailing list