[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] msgget03: don't depend on existed shared resources

[Petr Vorel]

> Hi!
> > In different patch [1] (I forget you already send patches to fix this) I counted
> > items in /proc/sysvipc/shm. Not sure what is safer: <= looks a bit drastic
> > (how about bug which reports ENOSPC much earlier than it should be?), but
> > obviously new mapping from other program created in the middle of testing.

> I think that we allready discussed this in another thread:

> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-July/023831.html

Thanks, I forgot this. In that case my approach (not using <=, but count
segments in /proc/sysvipc/shm before testing) might be more precise.
But no strong feeling about that, both solutions fix the test, let's chose one
and merge.

Kind regards,
Petr