[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] msgget03: don't depend on existed shared resources

[xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com]

Hi Petr
> Hi all,
>
>> Hi Cyril, Petr
>>> Hi!
>>>>> I think that we allready discussed this in another thread:
>
>>>>> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-July/023831.html
>
>>>> Thanks, I forgot this. In that case my approach (not using<=, but count
>>>> segments in /proc/sysvipc/shm before testing) might be more precise.
>>>> But no strong feeling about that, both solutions fix the test, let's chose one
>>>> and merge.
>
>>> As I said previously, there are many SysV IPC tests that do expect that
>>> nobody will add/remove IPC shm/queue/semaphores during the testrun and
>>> some of the testcases cannot even be implemented without this
>>> expectation.
>
>>> Hence I wouldn't complicate the test here and just count how many
>>> segments are there at the start and be done with it.
>> Agree.
>
>> A possible solution(alter get_used_queues api in new ipc lib and add
>> file parametrers, so we can use this api for msgget03) I have mentioned
>> in the previous email, the url as below:
>> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-July/023653.html
> LGTM. Or use /proc/sysvipc/shm instead of /proc/sysvipc/msg in get_used_queues()
> as you noted get_used_queues() has not been used yet.
I rename get_used_queues to get_used_sysvipc_cnt. see attached patch.
>
> BTW searching where get_used_queues() appeared, I see [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/4]
> syscalls/ipc: add newipc library for new API [1], but if I'm not mistaken
> get_used_queues() was not used even there, maybe it was in some previous
> versions.
Yes, no new api case use GET_USED_QUEUES api.
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
> [1] https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2016-December/003239.html

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-libs-libnewipc-Rename-get_used_queues-as-get_used_sy.patch
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20210727/401bfffc/attachment.ksh>