[LTP] [PATCH v2] crypto/af_alg02: thread termination fixes

[Li Wang]

Hi Joerg,

> > That should work but no precise log to indicate where goes wrong,
> > so I vote to go the loop way:).
> Does it really matter? The being stuck in the read does not seem to be
> the failure case tested with this test. Otherwise it would TFAIL.
> Additionally the loop and "custom" timeout was only introduced at a
> later stage of the test. Initially it relied on the default timeout
> handling.
>

It's doesn't matter actually.


> If my assumption, that being stuck in the read is not the failure case
> of this test, then your argument is invalid. Your argument would work for
> each and every line of code, that might be executed, when the timeout hits.
>

Yes right, but I was not arguing for that.
I just provide more opinions for Alexey to make a final decision:).

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20210730/0ac04989/attachment.htm>