[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] syscalls/fchown: Convert fchown05 to the new API
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Thu Jun 3 14:05:22 CEST 2021
Hi!
> - {"Change Owner/Group ids", 700, 701},
> - {"Change Owner id only", 702, -1},
> - {"Change Owner id only", 703, 701},
> - {"Change Group id only", -1, 704},
> - {"Change Group id only", 703, 705},
> - {NULL, 0, 0}
> + {700, 701},
> + {702, 701},
> + {702, 703},
> + {704, 705}
> };
Can we please keep the tests where we check that -1 does not change the
value and where we asert that the previously set value is still there
after the fchown call?
We may as well add a check that fchown(fd, -1, -1) is no-op.
> + TST_EXP_PASS(FCHOWN(fd, tc[i].uid, tc[i].gid));
This produces a bit ugly output, what about adding format string and
parameters like:
TST_EXP_PASS(FCHOWN(fd, tc[i].uid, tc[i].gid),
"fchwon(%i, %i, %i)", fd, tc[i].uid, tc[i].gid);
I guess I will push a similar patch that fixes this for fchown04 as well.
> static void cleanup(void)
> {
> - if (fildes > 0 && close(fildes))
> - tst_resm(TWARN | TERRNO, "close(%s) Failed", TESTFILE);
> -
> - tst_rmdir();
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
We really have to check if the fd has been opened, since the test can
exit in any SAFE_MACRO() so this has to be:
if (fd > 0)
SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
Other than these this is a nice cleanup.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list