[LTP] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Libclang based analyzer

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Richie,

> Hello,

> This implements a TEST() check and integrates the check into the build
> system.

> Compared to the Coccinelle version it's very ugly. However I think
> this will allow us to get all the low hanging fruit without creating
> major problems for test developers.

> I guess it could be run during CI if we either fix all the existing
> TEST() usages in the library or add an ignore list. I already have a
> Coccinelle script to help with the former.
+1.

FYI yesterday I sent patch to add make check{,-c,shell}, but for running C/shell API tests:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/?series=247103

Taking 2 latests commits + adding clang-devel / libclang-dev packages makes CI
running.

https://github.com/pevik/ltp/commit/b2427f39ddb15c97761208a605637e0da6fe66ca

The only missing piece is include/mk/clang-checks.mk (this patchset not even
compile now).

> Richard Palethorpe (2):
>   Add 'make checks' and clang-checks to build system
make check ... clang-check (to avoid confusion).

>   Start libclang based analyzer and TEST() check

>  configure.ac                       |   2 +
>  include/mk/config.mk.in            |   5 +
>  include/mk/env_post.mk             |   8 ++
>  include/mk/generic_leaf_target.inc |   5 +-
>  include/mk/lib.mk                  |   3 +
>  include/mk/rules.mk                |   9 ++
>  include/mk/testcases.mk            |   1 +
>  tools/clang-checks/.gitignore      |   1 +
>  tools/clang-checks/Makefile        |  13 ++
>  tools/clang-checks/main.c          | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I'd name it tools/clang-check/ (and include/mk/clang-check.mk), but that's just
personal opinion.

Kind regards,
Petr

>  10 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/clang-checks/.gitignore
>  create mode 100644 tools/clang-checks/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 tools/clang-checks/main.c