[LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] controllers/cpuacct: skip cpuacct_100_100 on small memory systems

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com
Wed Jun 16 09:27:42 CEST 2021


On 15/06/2021 18:40, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> +check_free_memory()
>> +{
>> +	local memneeded
>> +	local memfree=`awk '/MemAvailable/ {print $2}' /proc/meminfo`
>> +
>> +	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
>> +		local memcached
>> +
>> +		memfree=`awk '/MemFree/ {print $2}' /proc/meminfo`
>> +		test $? || return 0
>> +
>> +		memcached=`awk '/MemCached/ {print $2}' /proc/meminfo`
>> +		test $? || return 0
> 
> I do not think that something as basic as awk on /proc/meminfo here will
> fail...

It's still nice pattern to check for return values but if you insist, I
can drop it.

> 
>> +		memfree=$((memfree + memcached))
>> +	fi
>> +
>> +	# On x86_64, each 100 of processes were using ~16 MB of memory,
>> +	# so try to estimate the needed free memory based on this.
>> +	memneeded=$((max * nbprocess * 16384 / 100))
>> +
>> +	if [ $memfree -lt $memneeded ]; then
> 
> I would still add some memory margin to the memneeded here. At least
> add a hundred of megabytes before we do the check.

Sure.

> 
>> +		tst_brk TCONF "not enough of free memory on this system (approximate need $memneeded kB, free $memfree kB)"
>> +	fi
>> +	tst_res TINFO "memory requirements fulfilled (approximate need $memneeded kB, free $memfree kB)"
>> +
>> +	return 0
>> +}
>> +
>> +check_limits()
>> +{
>> +	local realuid="$SUDO_UID"
>> +	local tasksneeded=$((max * nbprocess + 100))
>> +
>> +	if [ "$realuid" = "" ]; then
>> +		realuid=`id -u`
>> +		test $? || return 0
>> +	fi
>> +
>> +	local tasksmax=`systemctl show user-${real_uid}.slice | awk -F '=' '/TasksMax/ {print $2}'`
>> +	test $? || return 0
>> +
>> +	if [ $tasksmax -le $tasksneeded ]; then
>> +		tst_brk TCONF "limit of tasks is too low (approximate need $tasksneeded, limit $tasksmax)"
>> +	fi
>> +	tst_res TINFO "task limit fulfilled (approximate need $tasksneeded, limit $tasksmax)"
> 
> Huh, is this really needed? The test is supposed to run under root. The
> user is supposed to login as a root or at least do 'su -' before
> executing LTP anyways.

Yeah, because even root sessions (user-0.slice) have the PID limit set
by systemd.

$ ssh root@....
$ grep . /sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/*/*
/sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/user-0.slice/cgroup.clone_children:0
/sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/user-0.slice/notify_on_release:0
/sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/user-0.slice/pids.current:5
/sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/user-0.slice/pids.events:max 0
/sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/user-0.slice/pids.max:5207


> 
>> +	return 0
>> +}
>> +
>>  setup()
>>  {
>>  	if ! grep -q -w cpuacct /proc/cgroups; then
>>  		tst_brk TCONF "cpuacct not supported on this system"
>>  	fi
>>  
>> +	check_limits
>> +	# Don't bother with memory limit checks on smaller tests
>> +	if [ $max -ge 100 ] && [ $nbprocess -ge 100 ]; then
> 
> We should probably check if the $max * $mbprocess -ge 1000 or something
> like that just in a case someone addds a test with large enough
> $nbprocess.

Makes sense, optionally the check can be done always.

Thanks for the review!


Best regards,
Krzysztof


More information about the ltp mailing list