[LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] syscalls: Use more accurate TST_EXP_FAIL2 macro

xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
Tue Jun 29 13:16:02 CEST 2021


Hi Cyril

When I do this patch, I found a tst_res usage problem in sendfile06.c.

see https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/runs/2933366481#step:10:3797

Best Regards
Yang Xu
> For these modified files, the return value is expected to be non-negative integer
> if call passes. So they should use TST_EXP_FAIL2 macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/accept/accept01.c             | 2 +-
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/adjtimex/adjtimex02.c         | 2 +-
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_getevents/io_getevents01.c | 3 ++-
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_submit/io_submit03.c       | 2 +-
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open02.c                 | 2 +-
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open11.c                 | 2 +-
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmmsg/recvmmsg01.c         | 2 +-
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile03.c         | 2 +-
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile04.c         | 2 +-
>   9 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/accept/accept01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/accept/accept01.c
> index 52234b792..85af0f8af 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/accept/accept01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/accept/accept01.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void verify_accept(unsigned int nr)
>   {
>   	struct test_case *tcase =&tcases[nr];
> 
> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(accept(*tcase->fd, tcase->sockaddr,&tcase->salen),
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(accept(*tcase->fd, tcase->sockaddr,&tcase->salen),
>   	             tcase->experrno, "%s", tcase->desc);
>   }
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/adjtimex/adjtimex02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/adjtimex/adjtimex02.c
> index 5d8d7019b..747d83254 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/adjtimex/adjtimex02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/adjtimex/adjtimex02.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void verify_adjtimex(unsigned int i)
>   		}
>   	}
> 
> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(tv->adjtimex(bufp), tc[i].exp_err, "adjtimex() error");
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(tv->adjtimex(bufp), tc[i].exp_err, "adjtimex() error");
> 
>   	if (tc[i].exp_err == EPERM)
>   		SAFE_SETEUID(0);
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_getevents/io_getevents01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_getevents/io_getevents01.c
> index 9dba4addf..e8a426ab6 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_getevents/io_getevents01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_getevents/io_getevents01.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ static void run(void)
>   	aio_context_t ctx;
> 
>   	memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(tst_syscall(__NR_io_getevents, ctx, 0, 0, NULL, NULL), EINVAL);
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(tst_syscall(__NR_io_getevents, ctx, 0, 0, NULL, NULL), EINVAL,
> +		"io_getevents syscall with invalid ctx");
>   }
> 
>   static struct tst_test test = {
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_submit/io_submit03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_submit/io_submit03.c
> index 052b0c8cc..90780c0e4 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_submit/io_submit03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/io_submit/io_submit03.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void cleanup(void)
> 
>   static void run(unsigned int i)
>   {
> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(tst_syscall(__NR_io_submit, *tc[i].ctx, tc[i].nr, tc[i].iocbs),
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(tst_syscall(__NR_io_submit, *tc[i].ctx, tc[i].nr, tc[i].iocbs),
>   		     tc[i].exp_errno, "io_submit() with %s", tc[i].desc);
>   }
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open02.c
> index ca9839c2d..67bf423ae 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open02.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void verify_open(unsigned int n)
>   {
>   	struct tcase *tc =&tcases[n];
> 
> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(open(tc->filename, tc->flag, 0444),
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(open(tc->filename, tc->flag, 0444),
>   	             tc->exp_errno, "open() %s", tc->desc);
>   }
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open11.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open11.c
> index ded384fa8..3c3c11b84 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open11.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/open/open11.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static struct test_case {
>   static void verify_open(unsigned int n)
>   {
>   	if (tc[n].err>  0) {
> -		TST_EXP_FAIL(open(tc[n].path, tc[n].flags, tc[n].mode),
> +		TST_EXP_FAIL2(open(tc[n].path, tc[n].flags, tc[n].mode),
>   		             tc[n].err, "%s", tc[n].desc);
>   	} else if (tc[n].err == 0) {
>   		TST_EXP_FD(open(tc[n].path, tc[n].flags, tc[n].mode),
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmmsg/recvmmsg01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmmsg/recvmmsg01.c
> index 10eaa3dcd..fb21ea1e7 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmmsg/recvmmsg01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/recvmmsg/recvmmsg01.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void do_test(unsigned int i)
>   	else
>   		timeout = tst_ts_get(&ts);
> 
> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(tv->recvmmsg(*tc->fd, *tc->msg_vec, VLEN, 0, timeout),
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(tv->recvmmsg(*tc->fd, *tc->msg_vec, VLEN, 0, timeout),
>   	             tc->exp_errno, "recvmmsg() %s", tc->desc);
>   }
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile03.c
> index dda651703..85a3b0f35 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile03.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile03.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void cleanup(void)
> 
>   static void run(unsigned int i)
>   {
> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(sendfile(*(tc[i].out_fd), *(tc[i].in_fd), NULL, 1),
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(sendfile(*(tc[i].out_fd), *(tc[i].in_fd), NULL, 1),
>   		     EBADF, "sendfile(..) with %s", tc[i].desc);
>   }
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile04.c
> index 8ebeb3c10..9a8ec08b9 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendfile/sendfile04.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void run(unsigned int i)
>   	if (tc[i].pass_unmapped_buffer)
>   		SAFE_MUNMAP(protected_buffer, sizeof(*protected_buffer));
> 
> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(sendfile(out_fd, in_fd, protected_buffer, 1),
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(sendfile(out_fd, in_fd, protected_buffer, 1),
>   		     EFAULT, "sendfile(..) with %s, protection=%d",
>   		     tc[i].desc, tc[i].protection);
> 


More information about the ltp mailing list