[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/semctl09: Skip libc test if SEM_STAT_ANY not defined

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Xu,

> > > +	if (tst_variant == 1)
> > > +		tst_brk(TCONF, "libc does not support semctl(SEM_STAT_ANY)");
> > > +#endif
> > Although I understand why you want to quit only tests with root
> > (only these fail), it's a bit confusing to test with user nobody
> > and then quit the same testing with root.

> I don't get this.  Martin only wants to skip libc test when undefined and it
> doesn't matter which user we use.

if (tst_variant == 1)
	tst_brk(TCONF, "libc does not support semctl(SEM_STAT_ANY)");

means:

# /semctl09
tst_test.c:1289: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
semctl09.c:76: TINFO: Test SYS_semctl syscall
semctl09.c:141: TINFO: Test SEM_STAT_ANY with nobody user
semctl09.c:163: TPASS: SEM_INFO returned valid index 19 to semid 19
semctl09.c:173: TPASS: Counted used = 1
semctl09.c:121: TPASS: semset_cnt = 1
semctl09.c:128: TPASS: sen_cnt = 2
semctl09.c:141: TINFO: Test SEM_STAT_ANY with root user
semctl09.c:163: TPASS: SEM_INFO returned valid index 19 to semid 19
semctl09.c:173: TPASS: Counted used = 1
semctl09.c:121: TPASS: semset_cnt = 1
semctl09.c:128: TPASS: sen_cnt = 2
tst_test.c:1289: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
semctl09.c:191: TCONF: libc does not support semctl(SEM_STAT_ANY)

i.e. run first test with user nobody and skip the second.
It's a bit confusing to test anything with SEM_STAT_ANY and then state
TCONF: libc does not support semctl(SEM_STAT_ANY) :)

Kind regards,
Petr