[LTP] [PATCH v3 3/4] lib: ignore SIGINT in _tst_kill_test

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Li, Joerg, Cyril,

> Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:

> > > Does this below (rough solution in my mind) work for you?
> > LGTM, but Joerg, Metan, could you please have a look?

> Thanks, I wouldn't send a patch until Joerg/Cyril has a review.
> (Maybe Joerg will have another better solution:)
Understand.

> > > diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/shell/timeout03.sh
> > > b/lib/newlib_tests/shell/timeout03.sh
> > > index cd548d9a2..f39f5712a 100755
> > > --- a/lib/newlib_tests/shell/timeout03.sh
> > > +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/shell/timeout03.sh
> > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ TST_TIMEOUT=1

> > >  do_test()
> > >  {
> > > +       trap "echo 'Sorry, timeout03 is still alive'" TERM
> > Any reason why not use tst_res TINFO? (working on bash).

> +1
> I just use echo for a quick test, but surely we can replace it with tst_res.
+1


> > > -       while kill -0 $pid 2>&1 > /dev/null && [ $i -gt 0 ]; do
> > > +       while kill -0 $pid &>/dev/null && [ $i -gt 0 ]; do
> > FYI: &> is a bashism (we need to keep the original).

> I just want the error does not to redirect to standard output.
> Because with SIGTERM sending, it seems easier to kill all
> processes, so 'kill -0 $pid' returns "No such process" errors often.

> Mayby I should go with: kill -0 $pid >/dev/null 2>&1
+1. Now I see it, "2>&1 > /dev/null" is wrong, it must be vice versa.

Kind regards,
Petr

> e.g.

> # ./timeout04.sh
> timeout04 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 0m 1s
> timeout04 1 TINFO: Start
> timeout04 1 TBROK: Test timeouted, sending SIGTERM! If you are running
> on slow machine, try exporting LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL > 1
> Terminated
> ./../../../testcases/lib/tst_test.sh: line 448: kill: (74911) - No such process
> ./../../../testcases/lib/tst_test.sh: line 454: kill: (74911) - No such process