[LTP] [PATCH] open_posix: remove pthread_kill/6-1

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_kill/assertions.xml b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_kill/assertions.xml
> index 2289b9bfbb2e..fa74c312bebb 100644
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_kill/assertions.xml
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_kill/assertions.xml
> @@ -16,10 +16,6 @@
>    <assertion id="5" tag="ref:XSH6:33594:33595 pt:THR">
>      No signal shall be sent if the pthread_kill() function fails.
>    </assertion>
> -  <assertion id="6" tag="ref:XSH6:33598:33599 pt:THR">
> -    [ESRCH] No thread could be found corresponding to that specified by
> -    the given thread ID.
> -  </assertion>
>    <assertion id="7" tag="ref:XSH6:33600:33600 pt:THR">
>      [EINVAL] The value of the sig argument is an invalid or unsupported
>      signal number.
> diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_kill/coverage.txt b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_kill/coverage.txt
> index 03dc3d5a718a..8cfa3d8b6ba3 100644
> --- a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_kill/coverage.txt
> +++ b/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_kill/coverage.txt
> @@ -6,6 +6,5 @@ Assertion	Status
>  3		YES
>  4		IMPLICITLY tested by assertions 6 and 7.
>  5		IMPLICITLY tested by assertions 6 and 7.
> -6		YES
>  7		YES
>  8		WON'T test. No way to interrupt the pthread_kill() call.


Shouldn't we just flip the YES to WON'T test in the coverage?

I'm not sure how to maintain the assertions or coverage files to be
honest.

Otherwise it looks good. The ESRCH return was always a recommendation
and not an requirement.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz