[LTP] [PATCH v3 1/1] setgroups03: Fix running more iterations (-i 2)

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> -int setup1();			/* setup function to test error EPERM */
> +void setup1(const char *uid, uid_t euid);	/* setup function to test error EPERM */
>  void setup();			/* setup function for the test */
>  void cleanup();			/* cleanup function for the test */
>  
> @@ -95,7 +93,7 @@ struct test_case_t {		/* test case struct. to hold ref. test cond's */
>  	int list;
>  	char *desc;
>  	int exp_errno;
> -	int (*setupfunc) ();
> +	void (*setupfunc)(const char *uid, uid_t euid);
>  } Test_cases[] = {
>  	{
>  	1, 1, "Size is > sysconf(_SC_NGROUPS_MAX)", EINVAL, NULL}, {
> @@ -126,7 +124,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < TST_TOTAL; i++) {
>  			if (Test_cases[i].setupfunc != NULL) {
> -				Test_cases[i].setupfunc();
> +				Test_cases[i].setupfunc(nobody_uid, ltpuser->pw_uid);
>  			}
>  
>  			gidsetsize = ngroups_max + Test_cases[i].gsize_add;
> @@ -156,8 +154,11 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  					 gidsetsize, test_desc, TEST_ERRNO,
>  					 Test_cases[i].exp_errno);
>  			}
> -		}
>  
> +			if (Test_cases[i].setupfunc != NULL) {
> +				Test_cases[i].setupfunc("root", ltpuser->pw_uid);
> +			}
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	cleanup();
> @@ -176,8 +177,9 @@ void setup(void)
>  
>  	tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
>  
> -	TEST_PAUSE;
> +	ltpuser = SAFE_GETPWNAM(cleanup, uid);
>  
> +	TEST_PAUSE;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -187,29 +189,21 @@ void setup(void)
>   *  Get the user info. from /etc/passwd file.
>   *  This function returns 0 on success.
>   */
> -int setup1(void)
> +void setup1(const char *uid, uid_t euid)
>  {
> -	struct passwd *user_info;	/* struct. to hold test user info */
> -
> -/* Switch to nobody user for correct error code collection */
> -	ltpuser = getpwnam(nobody_uid);
> -	if (seteuid(ltpuser->pw_uid) == -1) {
> -		tst_resm(TINFO, "setreuid failed to "
> -			 "to set the effective uid to %d", ltpuser->pw_uid);
> -		perror("setreuid");
> -	}
> +	struct passwd *user_info;
>  
> -	if ((user_info = getpwnam(TESTUSER)) == NULL) {
> -		tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "getpwnam(2) of %s Failed", TESTUSER);
> -	}
> +	SAFE_SETEUID(cleanup, euid);
> +
> +	user_info = SAFE_GETPWNAM(cleanup, uid);

I still do not get why we call SAFE_GETPWNAM() here. We should do that
in the setup and prepare two different group_list[] lists, if that is
really needed.

But I guess that all we need in this test is:

* Run the EINVAL test as a root

* Run the EPERM test as a nobody

The content of the list should not matter, as a matter of a fact we pass
unitialized data in the EINVAL case. What matters is the size argument,
it should be 1 for the EPERM test and max+1 for the EINVAL case.

>  	if (!GID_SIZE_CHECK(user_info->pw_gid)) {
>  		tst_brkm(TBROK,
>  			 cleanup,
>  			 "gid returned from getpwnam is too large for testing setgroups16");
>  	}
> +
>  	groups_list[0] = user_info->pw_gid;
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz