[LTP] [PATCH 0/7] docparse improvements

Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz
Fri Oct 29 10:54:03 CEST 2021


Hi!
> It's incredibly fast, it has no trouble parsing the entire kernel.
> 
> Weggli uses tree-sitter
> 
> https://github.com/googleprojectzero/weggli
> ________________________________________________________
> Executed in   49.35 millis    fish           external
>    usr time  110.88 millis    0.00 millis  110.88 millis
>    sys time   87.44 millis    1.20 millis   86.24 millis

This looks like it's about the speed of grep, that sounds incredible.

> > Well I would say that this patchset is the last addition for the parser,
> > if we ever need anything more complex we should really switch to
> > something else. On the other hand I do not think that we will ever need
> > more complexity in the parser than this, as long as we keep things
> > sane.
> 
> This closes the door on a lot of options for no upside AFAICT. We have
> two tools (Sparse and tree-sitter) that can be (or have been) vendored
> and will parse a large subset of C. Sparse goes a step further allowing
> control flow analysis. The usual reasons for reinventing the wheel are
> not present.

Still working on a prototype based on tree-sitter would take a week or
two worth of time and I would like to get the metadata fixed now, so
that I can finally move on with runltp-ng. So I would slightly prefer
merging the patches for the current solution first, then we can have a
look on tree-sitter in the next LTP release cycle. What do you think?

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz


More information about the ltp mailing list