[LTP] [PATCH v3 3/5] syscalls/dup2/dup203: Convert to new API

Xiao Yang ice_yangxiao@163.com
Fri Sep 17 10:16:55 CEST 2021


On 9/16/21 6:49 PM, QI Fuli wrote:
> From: QI Fuli <qi.fuli@fujitsu.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: QI Fuli <qi.fuli@fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/dup2/dup203.c | 307 ++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 186 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/dup2/dup203.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/dup2/dup203.c
> index e6f281adf..86ad49dc1 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/dup2/dup203.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/dup2/dup203.c
> @@ -1,208 +1,143 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>   /*
> - *
> - *   Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2001
> - *
> - *   This program is free software;  you can redistribute it and/or modify
> - *   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> - *   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> - *   (at your option) any later version.
> - *
> - *   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> - *   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the implied warranty of
> - *   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See
> - *   the GNU General Public License for more details.
> - *
> - *   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> - *   along with this program;  if not, write to the Free Software
> - *   Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> + * Copyright (c) International Business Machines  Corp., 2001
> + * 	07/2001 Ported by Wayne Boyer
>    */
>   
> -/*
> - * NAME
> - *	dup203.c
> - *
> - * DESCRIPTION
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
>    *	Testcase to check the basic functionality of dup2().
> - *
> - * ALGORITHM
> - *	1.	Attempt to dup2() on an open file descriptor.
> - *	2.	Attempt to dup2() on a close file descriptor.
> - *
> - * USAGE:  <for command-line>
> - *  dup203 [-c n] [-f] [-i n] [-I x] [-P x] [-t]
> - *     where,  -c n : Run n copies concurrently.
> - *             -f   : Turn off functionality Testing.
> - *             -i n : Execute test n times.
> - *             -I x : Execute test for x seconds.
> - *             -P x : Pause for x seconds between iterations.
> - *             -t   : Turn on syscall timing.
> - *
> - * HISTORY
> - *	07/2001 Ported by Wayne Boyer
> - *
> - * RESTRICTIONS
> - *	NONE
> + *	1. Attempt to dup2() on an open file descriptor.
> + *	2. Attempt to dup2() on a close file descriptor.

Hi Qi,

Same issue.

>    */
>   
> -#include <fcntl.h>
> -#include <sys/param.h>
>   #include <errno.h>
> -#include <string.h>
> -#include "test.h"
> -#include "safe_macros.h"
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "tst_safe_macros.h"
> +
> +static int fd0, fd1, fd2;
> +static char filename0[40], filename1[40];
> +static char buf[40];
> +
> +static void verify_open(void);
> +static void verify_close(void);
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> +	char *desc;
> +	void (*verify)();
> +} tcases [] = {
> +	{"Test duping over an open fd", verify_open},
> +	{"Test close on exec flag", verify_close},
> +};
> +
> +static void verify_open(void)
> +{
> +	fd0 = SAFE_CREAT(filename0, 0666);
> +	SAFE_WRITE(1, fd0, filename0, strlen(filename0));
> +	SAFE_CLOSE(fd0);
>   
> -void setup(void);
> -void cleanup(void);
> +	fd1 = SAFE_CREAT(filename1, 0666);
> +	SAFE_WRITE(1, fd1, filename1, strlen(filename1));
> +	SAFE_CLOSE(fd1);
>   
> -char *TCID = "dup203";
> -int TST_TOTAL = 1;
> +	fd0 = SAFE_OPEN(filename0, O_RDONLY);
> +	fd1 = SAFE_OPEN(filename1, O_RDONLY);
>   
> -int main(int ac, char **av)
> -{
> -	int fd0, fd1, fd2, rval;
> -	char filename0[40], filename1[40];
> -	char buf[40];
> -
> -	int lc;
> -
> -	tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
> -
> -	setup();
> -
> -	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
> -
> -		tst_count = 0;
> -//block1:
> -		tst_resm(TINFO, "Enter block 1");
> -		tst_resm(TINFO, "Test duping over an open fd");
> -
> -		sprintf(filename0, "dup202.file0.%d\n", getpid());
> -		sprintf(filename1, "dup202.file1.%d\n", getpid());
> -		unlink(filename0);
> -		unlink(filename1);
> -
> -		if ((fd0 = creat(filename0, 0666)) == -1)
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "cannot create first file");
> -		if (write(fd0, filename0, strlen(filename0)) == -1)
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "filename0: write(2) failed");
> -
> -		if ((fd1 = creat(filename1, 0666)) == -1)
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Cannot create second file");
> -		if (write(fd1, filename1, strlen(filename1)) == -1)
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "filename1: write(2) failed");
> -
> -		SAFE_CLOSE(cleanup, fd0);
> -		if ((fd0 = open(filename0, O_RDONLY)) == -1)
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "open(2) on filename0 failed");
> -
> -		SAFE_CLOSE(cleanup, fd1);
> -		if ((fd1 = open(filename1, O_RDONLY)) == -1)
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "open(2) on filename1 failed");
> -
> -		TEST(dup2(fd0, fd1));
> -
> -		if ((fd2 = TEST_RETURN) == -1) {
> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "call failed unexpectedly");
> -		} else {
> -			if (fd1 != fd2) {
> -				tst_resm(TFAIL, "file descriptors don't match");
> -				break;
> -			}
> -
> -			memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> -			if (read(fd2, buf, sizeof(buf)) == -1)
> -				tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "read(2) failed");
> -			if (strcmp(buf, filename0) != 0)
> -				tst_resm(TFAIL, "read from file got bad data");
> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "dup2 test 1 functionality is correct");
> -		}
> -
> -		close(fd0);
> -		close(fd1);
> -		close(fd2);
> -		unlink(filename0);
> -		unlink(filename1);
> -
> -		tst_resm(TINFO, "Exit block 1");
> -
> -//block2:
> -		tst_resm(TINFO, "Enter block 2");
> -		tst_resm(TINFO, "Test close on exec flag");
> -
> -		sprintf(filename0, "dup02.%d\n", getpid());
> -		unlink(filename0);
> -
> -		if ((fd0 = creat(filename0, 0666)) == -1) {
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Cannot create first file");
> -		}
> -		if (fcntl(fd0, F_SETFD, 1) == -1) {
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "setting close on exec flag "
> -				 "on fd0 failed");
> -		}
> -
> -		if ((fd2 = creat(filename1, 0666)) == -1) {
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Cannot create second file");
> -		}
> -
> -		/* SAFE_CLOSE() sets the fd to -1 avoid it here */
> -		rval = fd2;
> -		SAFE_CLOSE(cleanup, rval);
> -
> -		TEST(dup2(fd0, fd2));
> -
> -		if ((fd1 = TEST_RETURN) == -1) {
> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "call failed unexpectedly");
> -		} else {
> -			if (fd1 != fd2) {
> -				tst_resm(TFAIL, "bad dup2 descriptor %d", fd1);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -
> -			if ((rval = fcntl(fd1, F_GETFD, 0)) != 0) {
> -				tst_resm(TBROK | TERRNO,
> -					 "fcntl F_GETFD on fd1 failed; expected a "
> -					 "return value of 0x0, got %#x", rval);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -			if ((rval = (fcntl(fd0, F_GETFL, 0) & O_ACCMODE)) !=
> -			    O_WRONLY) {
> -				tst_resm(TFAIL, "fctnl F_GETFL bad rval on fd0 "
> -					 "Expected %#x got %#x", O_WRONLY,
> -					 rval);
> -			}
> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "dup2 test 2 functionality is correct");
> -		}
> -
> -		close(fd0);
> -		close(fd1);
> -
> -		unlink(filename0);
> -		unlink(filename1);
> -		tst_resm(TINFO, "Exit block 2");
> +	TEST(dup2(fd0, fd1));
> +
> +	fd2 = TST_RET;
> +	if (TST_RET == -1) {
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "call failed unexpectedly");
> +		goto free;
>   	}
>   
> -	cleanup();
> -	tst_exit();
> +	if (fd1 != fd2) {
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "file descriptors don't match");
> +		goto free;
> +	}
> +
> +	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> +	SAFE_READ(0, fd2, buf, sizeof(buf));
> +	if (strcmp(buf, filename0) != 0)
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "read from file got bad data");
> +	else
> +		tst_res(TPASS, "dup2 test 1 functionality is correct");
> +
> +free:
> +	SAFE_CLOSE(fd0);
> +	SAFE_CLOSE(fd1);
> +	SAFE_UNLINK(filename0);
> +	SAFE_UNLINK(filename1);
>   }
>   
> -/*
> - * setup() - performs all ONE TIME setup for this test.
> - */
> -void setup(void)
> +static void verify_close(void)
>   {
> +	int rval, rc = 0;
> +
> +	sprintf(filename0, "dup203.%d\n", getpid());
> +	unlink(filename0);
Please remove these redundant lines.
> +
> +	fd0 = SAFE_CREAT(filename0, 0666);
> +	SAFE_FCNTL(fd0, F_SETFD, 1);
> +
> +	fd2 = SAFE_CREAT(filename1, 0666);
>   
> -	tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
> +	/* SAFE_CLOSE() sets the fd to -1 avoid it here */
> +	rval = fd2;
> +	SAFE_CLOSE(rval);
>   
> -	TEST_PAUSE;
> +	TEST(dup2(fd0, fd2));
>   
> -	tst_tmpdir();
> +	fd1 = TST_RET;
> +	if (TST_RET == -1) {
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "call failed unexpectedly");
> +		goto free;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (fd1 != fd2) {
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "bad dup2 descriptor %d", fd1);
> +		goto free;
> +	}
> +
> +	rval = SAFE_FCNTL(fd1, F_GETFD, 0);
> +	if (rval != 0) {
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "fcntl F_GETFD on fd1 failed; expected a "
> +			"return value of 0x0, got %#x", rval);
> +		rc++;
> +	}

I think both verify_open() and verify_close() should verify two points:

1) check the content of file.

2) check the FD_CLOEXEC flag.

By the way, could you use a common function with different arguments? I 
think there are a lot of redundant code.

Best Regards,

Xiao Yang

> +
> +	if (!rc)
> +		tst_res(TPASS, "dup2 test 2 functionality is correct");
> +
> +free:
> +	SAFE_CLOSE(fd0);
> +	SAFE_CLOSE(fd1);
> +	SAFE_UNLINK(filename0);
> +	SAFE_UNLINK(filename1);
>   }
>   
> -/*
> - * cleanup() - performs all ONE TIME cleanup for this test at
> - *	       completion or premature exit.
> - */
> -void cleanup(void)
> +static void run(unsigned int i)
>   {
> -	tst_rmdir();
> +	struct tcase *tc = tcases + i;
> +
> +	tst_res(TINFO, tc->desc);
> +	tc->verify();
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +	int pid;
> +
> +	pid = getpid();
> +	sprintf(filename0, "dup203.file0.%d\n", pid);
> +	sprintf(filename1, "dup203.file1.%d\n", pid);
>   }
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.setup = setup,
> +	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> +	.needs_tmpdir = 1,
> +	.test = run,
> +};



More information about the ltp mailing list