[LTP] [PATCH] memcg_subgroup_charge: Remove limiting of parent
Joerg Vehlow
lkml@jv-coder.de
Mon Sep 20 07:20:23 CEST 2021
Hi
On 9/14/2021 10:34 AM, Richard Palethorpe via ltp wrote:
> It is not important how much memory is assigned to the parent
> group. The stated purpose of the test is to check no memory is
> assigned to the child group.
I still don't know why the test even wants to limit anything, when it is
just checking what is charged.
So I would still vote for completely removing the limits and simplifying
to just one test case.
But removing one limitation for now is a step in the right direction, so
I will not argue anymore :)
>
> Also add the usage stats for the memcg_process because it appears
> the test will fail because the starting memory counter already
> includes some buffer/cache on linux-next. I'm not sure this
> is exactly what happens, but displaying the stats might help.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
> Suggested-by: Joerg Vehlow <joerg.vehlow@aox-tech.de>
> Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> .../controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_lib.sh | 2 +-
> .../memcg/functional/memcg_subgroup_charge.sh | 16 +++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_lib.sh b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_lib.sh
> index ac9ad8268..1b76b6597 100755
> --- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_lib.sh
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_lib.sh
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ signal_memcg_process()
>
> loops=$((loops - 1))
> if [ $loops -le 0 ]; then
> - tst_brk TBROK "timed out on memory.usage_in_bytes"
> + tst_brk TBROK "timed out on memory.usage_in_bytes" $usage $usage_start $size
> fi
> done
> }
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_subgroup_charge.sh b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_subgroup_charge.sh
> index 3fa016102..cda624923 100755
> --- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_subgroup_charge.sh
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_subgroup_charge.sh
> @@ -18,22 +18,16 @@ TST_CNT=3
> MEM_TO_ALLOC=$((PAGESIZES * 2))
>
> # Test the memory charge won't move to subgroup
> -# $1 - memory.limit_in_bytes in parent group
> -# $2 - memory.limit_in_bytes in sub group
> +# $1 - memory.limit_in_bytes in sub group
> test_subgroup()
> {
> - local limit_parent=$1
> - local limit_subgroup=$2
> + local limit_subgroup=$1
>
> - if [ $limit_parent -ne 0 ]; then
> - limit_parent=$(memcg_adjust_limit_for_kmem $limit_parent)
> - fi
> if [ $limit_subgroup -ne 0 ]; then
> limit_subgroup=$(memcg_adjust_limit_for_kmem $limit_subgroup)
> fi
>
> ROD mkdir subgroup
> - EXPECT_PASS echo $limit_parent \> memory.limit_in_bytes
> EXPECT_PASS echo $limit_subgroup \> subgroup/memory.limit_in_bytes
>
> start_memcg_process --mmap-anon -s $MEM_TO_ALLOC
> @@ -60,17 +54,17 @@ test_subgroup()
> test1()
> {
> tst_res TINFO "Test that group and subgroup have no relationship"
> - test_subgroup $MEM_TO_ALLOC $((2 * MEM_TO_ALLOC))
> + test_subgroup $((2 * MEM_TO_ALLOC))
> }
>
> test2()
> {
> - test_subgroup $MEM_TO_ALLOC $MEM_TO_ALLOC
> + test_subgroup $MEM_TO_ALLOC
> }
>
> test3()
> {
> - test_subgroup $MEM_TO_ALLOC 0
> + test_subgroup 0
> }
>
> tst_run
Joerg
More information about the ltp
mailing list