[LTP] [PATCH v4] syscalls/mount_setattr01: Add basic functional test

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Dai Shili <daisl.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> + * Author: Chen Hanxiao <chenhx.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + *
> + * Basic mount_setattr() test.
> + * Test whether the basic mount attributes are set correctly.
> + *
> + * Verify some MOUNT_SETATTR(2) attributes:
> + *
> + * - 1) MOUNT_ATTR_RDONLY - makes the mount read-only
> + * - 2) MOUNT_ATTR_NOSUID - causes the mount not to honor the
> + *     set-user-ID and set-group-ID mode bits and file capabilities
> + *     when executing programs.
> + * - 3) MOUNT_ATTR_NODEV - prevents access to devices on this mount
> + * - 4) MOUNT_ATTR_NOEXEC - prevents executing programs on this mount
> + * - 5) MOUNT_ATTR_NOSYMFOLLOW - prevents following symbolic links
> + *    on this mount
> + * - 6) MOUNT_ATTR_NODIRATIME - prevents updating access time for
> + *    directories on this mount

The numbers here are useless and confusing I bet that it renders
strangely in asciidoc too.

> + * The functionality was added in v5.12.
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +
> +#include <sys/statvfs.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "lapi/fsmount.h"
> +#include "lapi/stat.h"
> +
> +#define MNTPOINT        "mntpoint"
> +#define OT_MNTPOINT     "ot_mntpoint"
> +#define TCASE_ENTRY(attrs, exp_attrs)   \
> +	{                                \
> +		.name = #attrs,                 \
> +		.mount_attrs = attrs,           \
> +		.expect_attrs = exp_attrs       \
> +	}
> +
> +static int mount_flag, otfd = -1;
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> +	char *name;
> +	unsigned int mount_attrs;
> +	unsigned int expect_attrs;
> +} tcases[] = {
> +	TCASE_ENTRY(MOUNT_ATTR_RDONLY, ST_RDONLY),
> +	TCASE_ENTRY(MOUNT_ATTR_NOSUID, ST_NOSUID),
> +	TCASE_ENTRY(MOUNT_ATTR_NODEV, ST_NODEV),
> +	TCASE_ENTRY(MOUNT_ATTR_NOEXEC, ST_NOEXEC),
> +	TCASE_ENTRY(MOUNT_ATTR_NOSYMFOLLOW, ST_NOSYMFOLLOW),
> +	TCASE_ENTRY(MOUNT_ATTR_NODIRATIME, ST_NODIRATIME),
> +};
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> +	if (otfd > -1)
> +		SAFE_CLOSE(otfd);
> +	if (mount_flag)
> +		SAFE_UMOUNT(OT_MNTPOINT);
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +	fsopen_supported_by_kernel();
> +	struct stat st = {0};
> +
> +	if (stat(OT_MNTPOINT, &st) == -1)
> +		SAFE_MKDIR(OT_MNTPOINT, 0777);
> +}
> +
> +static void run(unsigned int n)
> +{
> +	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
> +	struct mount_attr attr = {
> +		.attr_set = tc->mount_attrs,
> +	};
> +	struct statvfs buf;
> +
> +	TST_EXP_FD_SILENT(open_tree(AT_FDCWD, MNTPOINT, AT_EMPTY_PATH |
> +		AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW | OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC | OPEN_TREE_CLONE));
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		return;
> +
> +	otfd = (int)TST_RET;
> +
> +	TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(mount_setattr(otfd, "", AT_EMPTY_PATH, &attr, sizeof(attr)),
> +		"%s set", tc->name);
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(move_mount(otfd, "", AT_FDCWD, OT_MNTPOINT, MOVE_MOUNT_F_EMPTY_PATH));
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		goto out;
> +	mount_flag = 1;
> +
> +	TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(statvfs(OT_MNTPOINT, &buf), "statvfs sucess");
> +	if (!TST_PASS)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (buf.f_flag & tc->expect_attrs)
> +		tst_res(TPASS, "%s is actually set as expected", tc->name);
> +	else
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "%s is not actually set as expected", tc->name);
> +
> +out:
> +	if (otfd > -1)
> +		SAFE_CLOSE(otfd);
> +	if (tst_is_mounted_at_tmpdir(OT_MNTPOINT)) {
> +		mount_flag = 0;
> +		SAFE_UMOUNT(OT_MNTPOINT);
> +	}

Can we instead of the ifs just jump to a right label as I asked in the
previous review?

> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> +	.test = run,
> +	.setup = setup,
> +	.cleanup = cleanup,
> +	.needs_root = 1,
> +	.mount_device = 1,
> +	.mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
> +	.all_filesystems = 1,
> +	.skip_filesystems = (const char *const []){"fuse", NULL},
> +};
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz