[LTP] LTP test df01.sh detected different size of loop device in v5.19
Darrick J. Wong
djwong@kernel.org
Thu Aug 18 18:27:23 CEST 2022
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:05:33AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/18/22 10:25 AM, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Eric, all,
> >
>
> ...
>
> >
> >> IOWS, I think the test expects that free space is reflected in statfs numbers
> >> immediately after a file is removed, and that's no longer the case here. They
> >> change in between the df check and the statfs check.
> >
> >> (The test isn't just checking that the values are correct, it is checking that
> >> the values are /immediately/ correct.)
> >
> >> Putting a "sleep 1" after the "rm -f" in the test seems to fix it; IIRC
> >> the max time to wait for inodegc is 1s. This does slow the test down a bit.
> >
> > Sure, it looks like we can sleep just 50ms on my hw (although better might be to
> > poll for the result [1]), I just wanted to make sure there is no bug/regression
> > before hiding it with sleep.
> >
> > Thanks for your input!
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Petr
> >
> > [1] https://people.kernel.org/metan/why-sleep-is-almost-never-acceptable-in-tests
> >
> >> -Eric
> >
> > +++ testcases/commands/df/df01.sh
> > @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ df_test()
> > tst_res TFAIL "'$cmd' failed."
> > fi
> >
> > + if [ "$DF_FS_TYPE" = xfs ]; then
> > + tst_sleep 50ms
> > + fi
> > +
>
> Probably worth at least a comment as to why ...
>
> Dave / Darrick / Brian - I'm not sure how long it might take to finish inodegc?
> A too-short sleep will let the flakiness remain ...
A fsfreeze -f / fsfreeze -u cycle will force all the background garbage
collection to run to completion when precise free space accounting is
being tested.
--D
> -Eric
>
> > ROD_SILENT rm -rf mntpoint/testimg
> >
> > # flush file system buffers, then we can get the actual sizes.
> >
More information about the ltp
mailing list