[LTP] [PATCH v2] statvfs01: Convert to new LTP API

[Avinesh Kumar]

On Thursday, December 1, 2022 4:15:46 PM IST Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> > Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > > How about
> > > > 1) don't skip exfat and vfat but just skip creating file with valid
> > > name? or
> 
> > > > 2) Add #define NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE 6 and for vfat and exfat calculate
> > > > length as: buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE - 1 ?
> 
> 
> 
> > > Thank you for the review and research on vfat, exfat scenarios.
> > > I have adopted the option 1 for now and sent a v3 of this patch.
> 
> 
> > I thought option_1 meant to skip creating a valide-file when
> > detecting on "vfat,exfat" FS, but not skip for others.
> 
> > Or probably I misunderstood Petr's words.
> No, you understood me well. I wanted this to be in v3,
> but it's not there :).
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> > Anyway, don't hurry to send V3 until we get an agreement :).

Hi Petr, Li,

Sorry, I misunderstood and had removed the valid filename creation altogether,
I am correcting the patch in v4, as suggested by Li.

Thanks,
Avinesh

> 
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statvfs/statvfs01.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statvfs/statvfs01.c
> > @@ -30,7 +30,10 @@ static void run(void)
> >         memset(valid_fname, 'a', buf.f_namemax - 1);
> >         memset(invalid_fname, 'b', buf.f_namemax + 1);
> 
> > -       TST_EXP_FD(creat(valid_fname, 0444));
> > +       long fs_type = tst_fs_type(TEST_PATH);
> > +       if  (fs_type != TST_VFAT_MAGIC && fs_type != TST_EXFAT_MAGIC)
> > +               TST_EXP_FD(creat(valid_fname, 0444));
> > +
> >         TST_EXP_FAIL(creat(invalid_fname, 0444), ENAMETOOLONG);
> >  }
> 
> > @@ -46,9 +49,4 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
> >         .mount_device = 1,
> >         .mntpoint = MNT_POINT,
> >         .all_filesystems = 1,
> > -       .skip_filesystems = (const char *const[]) {
> > -               "vfat",
> > -               "exfat",
> > -               NULL
> > -       }
> >  };
>