[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/setresuid04: Use SETRESUID instead of SAFE_SETRESUID to check 16bit syscall

[xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com]

Hi Richard

> Hello,
> 
> Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> writes:
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>

Thanks, merged.

Best Regards
Yang Xu
> 
>> ---
>>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/setresuid/setresuid04.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setresuid/setresuid04.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setresuid/setresuid04.c
>> index 833aee91d..57b290f37 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setresuid/setresuid04.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/setresuid/setresuid04.c
>> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static void run(void)
>>   	pid_t pid;
>>   	int status;
>>   
>> -	SAFE_SETRESUID(-1, ltpuser->pw_uid, -1);
>> +	TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(SETRESUID(-1, ltpuser->pw_uid, -1));
>>   	TST_EXP_FAIL2(open(TEMP_FILE, O_RDWR), EACCES);
>>   
>>   	pid = SAFE_FORK();
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void run(void)
>>   	if (WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status) != 0)
>>   		tst_res(TFAIL, "child process exited with status: %d", status);
>>   
>> -	SAFE_SETRESUID(-1, 0, -1);
>> +	TST_EXP_PASS_SILENT(SETRESUID(-1, 0, -1));
>>   	TST_EXP_FD(open(TEMP_FILE, O_RDWR));
>>   	SAFE_CLOSE(TST_RET);
>>   }
>> -- 
>> 2.27.0
> 
>