[LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/1] lib: Print in summary also tests not run at all

[xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com]

Hi Li
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:39 AM Petr Vorel<pvorel@suse.cz>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Li,
>>
>> ...
>>> Yes, I understand. So how about this way:
>>
>>> --- a/lib/tst_test.c
>>> +++ b/lib/tst_test.c
>>> @@ -785,6 +785,8 @@ static void print_failure_hints(void)
>>>          print_failure_hint("known-fail", "hit by known kernel failures", NULL);
>>>   }
>>
>>> +static unsigned int test_variants = 1;
>>> +
>>>   static void do_exit(int ret)
>>>   {
>>>          if (results) {
>>> @@ -811,9 +813,11 @@ static void do_exit(int ret)
>>>                  fprintf(stderr, "broken   %d\n", results->broken);
>>>                  fprintf(stderr, "skipped  %d\n", results->skipped);
>>>                  fprintf(stderr, "warnings %d\n", results->warnings);
>>> -               fprintf(stderr, "not run  %d\n", tst_test->tcnt -
>>> -                               results->passed - results->failed -
>>> results->broken -
>>> -                               results->skipped - results->warnings);
>>> +               if (tst_test->tcnt) {
>>> +                       fprintf(stderr, "not-run  %d\n",
>>> (tst_test->tcnt * test_variants) -
>>> +                                       results->passed -
>>> results->failed - results->broken -
>>> +                                       results->skipped - results->warnings);
>>> +               }
>>>          }
In fact, we don't have mandatory rules that TAPSS or TFAIL only can 
occur one time. a example ie memcontrol02.c

Best Regards
Yang Xu

>>>          do_cleanup();
>>> @@ -1529,7 +1533,6 @@ unsigned int tst_variant;
>>>   void tst_run_tcases(int argc, char *argv[], struct tst_test *self)
>>>   {
>>>          int ret = 0;
>>> -       unsigned int test_variants = 1;
>>
>>>          lib_pid = getpid();
>>>          tst_test = self;
>>
>> Yep, ack this one, works well. Will you please send a proper patch?
>
> Sure, but I'd hold this until Xu Yang review. In case I have
> something thoughtless.

>
> Ps. He might reply late since now is on China NewYear holidays.
>