[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/pidfd_open04: Add new test with PIDFD_NONBLOCK flag
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Thu Feb 10 16:04:07 CET 2022
Hi!
> +/*\
> + * [Description]
> + *
> + * Verify that the PIDFD_NONBLOCK flag works with pidfd_open() and
> + * that waitid() with a non-blocking pidfd returns EAGAIN.
> + */
> +
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <sys/wait.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "lapi/pidfd_open.h"
> +
> +#ifndef PIDFD_NONBLOCK
> +#define PIDFD_NONBLOCK O_NONBLOCK
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef P_PIDFD
> +#define P_PIDFD 3
> +#endif
> +
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> + int flag, pid, pidfd, ret;
> + siginfo_t info;
> +
> + pid = SAFE_FORK();
> + if (!pid) {
> + TST_CHECKPOINT_WAIT(0);
> + exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
> + }
> +
> + TST_EXP_FD_SILENT(pidfd_open(pid, PIDFD_NONBLOCK),
> + "pidfd_open(%d, PIDFD_NONBLOCK)", pid);
> +
> + pidfd = TST_RET;
> + flag = fcntl(pidfd, F_GETFL);
> + if (flag == -1)
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TERRNO, "fcntl(F_GETFL) failed");
> +
> + if (!(flag & O_NONBLOCK))
> + tst_brk(TFAIL, "pidfd_open(%d, O_NONBLOCK) didn't set O_NONBLOCK flag", pid);
> +
> + tst_res(TPASS, "pidfd_open(%d, O_NONBLOCK) sets O_NONBLOCK flag", pid);
> +
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(waitid(P_PIDFD, pidfd, &info, WEXITED), EAGAIN,
> + "waitid(P_PIDFD,...,WEXITED)");
> +
> + TST_CHECKPOINT_WAKE(0);
> +
> + ret = TST_RETRY_FUNC(waitid(P_PIDFD, pidfd, &info, WEXITED), TST_RETVAL_EQ0);
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + tst_res(TPASS, "waitid(P_PIDFD) succeeded after child process terminated");
> + } else {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "waitid(P_PIDFD) failed after child process terminated");
> + SAFE_WAIT(NULL);
> + }
> +
> + SAFE_CLOSE(pidfd);
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + pidfd_open_supported();
> +
> + TEST(pidfd_open(getpid(), PIDFD_NONBLOCK));
> + if (TST_RET == -1) {
> + if (TST_ERR == EINVAL) {
> + tst_brk(TCONF, "PIDFD_NONBLOCK was supported since linux 5.10");
> + return;
> + }
> + tst_brk(TFAIL | TTERRNO,
> + "pidfd_open(getpid(),PIDFD_NONBLOCK) failed unexpectedly");
> + }
I guess that we should do SAFE_CLOSE(TST_RET); here. Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .needs_root = 1,
> + .forks_child = 1,
> + .needs_checkpoints = 1,
> + .setup = setup,
> + .test_all = run,
> +};
> --
> 2.23.0
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list